M21-1 Manual / Part V, Subpart ii, Chapter 3, Section B
Making Partial Rating Decisions
M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, Chapter 3, Section B
Overview
In This Section | | This section contains the topic “General Information on Partial Rating Decisions and Deferred Issues.” |
1. General Information on Partial Rating Decisions and Deferred Issues
Introduction | | This topic contains general information about partial rating decisions and deferred issues, including- when development to obtain additional evidence may be needed
- definition of partial rating decision
- when to make a partial rating decision
- partial ratings and automation
- improper use of a partial rating decision for service connection (SC) for cause of death
- when to defer an issue
- procedure for deferring previously denied issues, and
- action to take when SC for cause of death is deferred for further development.
|
Change Date | | November 15, 2023 |
V.ii.3.B.1.a. When Development to Obtain Additional Evidence May Be Needed | | Development to obtain additional evidence such as a medical examination or other records may be needed if- it would provide a more complete picture of a question at issue, or
- the evidence of record is questionable or conflicting.
Note: Decision makers must maintain objectivity when assigning weight to a claimant’s evidence and may not develop with the purpose of obtaining evidence to justify a denial of the claim. Instead, decision makers must be able to support the determination that development is needed. References: For more information on - ordering further development in cases where uncorroborated lay evidence is presented, see Douglas v. Shinseki, 23 Vet.App. 19 (2009)
- a Veteran’s submission of evidence and refusal to attend a Department of Veterans Affairs examination, see Kowalski v. Nicholson, 19 Vet.App. 171 (2005), and
- developing with the purpose of denying and explaining the need for development, see Mariano v. Principi, 17 Vet.App. 305 (2003).
|
V.ii.3.B.1.b. Definition: Partial Rating Decision | | A partial rating decision is a rating decision that provides a decision on some issues of a claim, but defers a decision on at least one other issue, pending the outcome of additional development. |
V.ii.3.B.1.c. When to Make a Partial Rating Decision | | Make a partial rating decision when one or more issues require additional development before they can be decided, but the record otherwise contains sufficient evidence to - decide (favorably or not) at least one other issue, and/or
- make a proposed or final decision on a compensation entitlement issue, such as a reduction in service-connected disability evaluation, severance of service connection (SC), or competency.
Important: - It is only appropriate to extend suspense or diary dates if it is necessary for a specific adjudicative action. Suspense dates must always correspond with specific actions and should not be arbitrarily extended under any circumstance.
- When employees handle a claim, they are expected to take the most full and complete action possible on a claim every time – including development, rating, and promulgation actions – to move a claim forward to accurate completion in the claims process. Every effort should be made to move the claim to the next processing cycle each time it is handled.
Exception: When issues cannot be resolved because of a Veteran’s return to active duty, follow the procedures in M21-1, Part X, Subpart v, 2.A.1.c. References: For more information on- evaluating competency, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart ii, 6.A
- proposed rating decisions, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart ii, 3.D
- reductions in awards, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart ii, 4.B, and
- severance of SC, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart ii, 5.B.
|
V.ii.3.B.1.d. Partial Ratings and Automation | | When a claim involves a mix of automation-eligible and automation-ineligible contentions in a ready for decision status,- defer automation-ineligible contentions that have not undergone initial development, and
- review the automation-eligible contention(s) for completion of a partial rating decision.
References: For more information on |
V.ii.3.B.1.e. Improper Use of a Partial Rating Decision for SC for Cause of Death | | Do not use a partial rating decision to deny SC for cause of death if development is pending or in progress for another condition possibly involved in the cause of death. |
V.ii.3.B.1.f. When to Defer an Issue | | Defer an issue when the rating activity receives a claim that is underdeveloped or incomplete when proper disposition of that issue depends on resolution of a development action. Reference: For more information on Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS) deferrals, see - M21-4, Chapter 6, 8.e for Veterans Service Center guidance
- M21-4, Chapter 7, 14 for pension management center guidance, and
- VBMS Deferral Job Aids.
|
V.ii.3.B.1.g. Procedure for Deferring Previously Denied Issues | | When a decision on a previously denied issue must now be deferred, decision makers should ensure the coded conclusion of the Codesheet lists the- previously denied issue as deferred, and
- date of the prior denial in the ORIGINAL DATE OF DENIAL field.
Example:Follow the steps in the table below when deferring a previously denied issue.| Step | Action |
|---|
| 1 | Ensure the- previously denied issue is reflected on the MASTER RECORD tab in VBMS-Rating, and
- appropriate date is listed in the ORIGINAL DATE OF DENIAL field.
Example: References: For more information on
| | 2 | On the ISSUE MANAGEMENT tab, follow the steps for establishing issues outlined in the VBMS Rating User Guide. | | 3 | Select the relevant issue in the ISSUE LIST field and click on the ENTER DECISION button. | | 4 | From the SELECT EVALUATION BUILDER screen, - choose Disability Decision Information – Manual Entry, and
- click on the OK button.
| | 5 | On the DISABILITY DECISION INFORMATION screen, choose Deferred from the DECISION drop-down menu. | | 6 | Complete the other required decision entries. | References: For more information on |
V.ii.3.B.1.h. Action to Take When SC for Cause of Death Is Deferred for Further Development | | If the rating activity returns a case for further development with regard to the issue of SC for cause of death,- request the indicated evidence
- award pension benefits if entitlement is established and an award was not made prior to submission of the case to the rating activity, and
- establish a 30-day control for submission of the requested evidence.
Once the 30-day evidentiary submission period has elapsed, resubmit the case to the rating activity for issuance of a formal decision on the issue of SC for cause of death. |
Source: VA M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, Chapter 3, Section B (U.S. government work, reproduced for reference). Browse all sections →