M21-1 Manual / Part VIII, Subpart iii, Chapter 4, Section B
Developing Claims for Service Connection (SC) for Disabilities Resulting from Ionizing Radiation Exposure Under 38 CFR 3.311
M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iii, Chapter 4, Section B
Overview
In This Section | This section contains the following topics:
|
1. General Information on Claims for SC for Disabilities Resulting From Ionizing Radiation Exposure Under 38 CFR 3.311
Introduction | This topic contains general information on claims for disabilities resulting from ionizing radiation exposure under 38 CFR 3.311, including
|
Change Date | June 3, 2015 |
VIII.iii.4.B.1.a. Provisions of 38 CFR 3.311 | The specific requirements for the adjudication of claims for service connection (SC) for disabilities resulting from exposure to ionizing radiation claims are found in 38 CFR 3.311.The provisions of 38 CFR 3.311(b)(1) require that the
|
VIII.iii.4.B.1.b. Presumptive Versus Direct SC | If a claimant files a claim for SC under the provisions of 38 CFR 3.311, the claims processor must also consider the claim for SC under the provisions of 38 CFR 3.303.Reference: For more information on disabilities resulting from radiation exposure, see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iii, 4.C. |
VIII.iii.4.B.1.c. Handling Claims That Require a Subsequent Review Under PL 98-542 | On October 24, 1984, Public Law (PL) 98-542, The Veterans’ Dioxin and Radiation Exposure Compensation Standards Act, was placed into law to address disabilities resulting from exposure to radiation as an atmospheric test participant or a member of the Hiroshima/Nagasaki occupation forces. If a claim was denied prior to the enactment of PL 98-542, claims processors must complete a de novo review of the evidence to determine if readjudication of the claim is warranted. Note: It is not necessary for the claimant to submit new and relevant evidence to justify readjudication of the previously denied claim.References: For more information on
|
VIII.iii.4.B.1.d. Handling Claims That Require a Subsequent Review Based on Dose Estimates Made Before May 8, 2003 | On May 8, 2003, the National Research Council, an independent agency contracted to review the Defense Threat Reduction Agency’s (DTRA) radiation dose estimates, reported that DTRA had underestimated upper bound radiation doses for atmospheric test participants and Hiroshima/Nagasaki occupation forces.When a claim was previously denied based on a dose estimate provided by DTRA before May 8, 2003, obtain a new dose estimate from DTRA and readjudicate the claim.Note: It is not necessary for the claimant to submit new and relevant evidence to justify readjudication of the previously denied claim. Reference: For more information on obtaining dose estimates, see M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iii, 4.B.4. |
VIII.iii.4.B.1.e. Handling Classified Information Needed to Validate Exposure to Nuclear Radiation | Veterans seeking benefits in connection with exposure to nuclear radiation are authorized by the Exposure to Nuclear Radiation and Department of Defense (DoD) Secrecy Agreement to divulge to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) the
|
VIII.iii.4.B.1.f. VA Responsibility for Expunging Classified Military Data | The fact that a Veteran inadvertently reveals classified military information during the course of applying for benefits should not be compounded further by releasing this information within or outside VA in any manner. Cut out (rather than obliterate) any classified information from related documents or statements.When expungement is necessary, follow the steps in the table below to properly remove the classified information.
|
2. Developing Claims for SC for Disabilities Resulting From Ionizing Radiation Exposure Under 38 CFR 3.311
Introduction | This topic contains information on developing claims for SC for disabilities resulting from ionizing radiation exposure under 38 CFR 3.311, including
|
Change Date | January 12, 2022 |
VIII.iii.4.B.2.a. Centralized Processing of Claims Based on Radiation Exposure | In October 2006, VA centralized the processing of all claims for SC based on radiation exposure at the Jackson Regional Office (RO), to include all claims for SC for disabilities resulting from exposure to ionizing radiation under 38 CFR 3.311.When ROs receives a claim identifying exposure to radiation, the existence of a radiogenic disease must be confirmed prior to transferring the claim to the Jackson RO. Confirmation of the existence of a presumptive disease under 38 CFR 3.309(d) in a “radiation-exposed veteran” or of a “radiogenic disease” as defined in 38 CFR 3.311 is, generally, a medical diagnosis from a health care provider.All folders with pending radiation claims must be transferred to the Jackson RO after the radiogenic disease is confirmed. Important:
|
VIII.iii.4.B.2.b. Procedures for Transferring Radiation Claims | After it has been determined that a radiation claim is ready to be transferred to the Jackson RO, the station in receipt of a claim for SC based on radiation exposure must add the Radiation Radiogenic Disability Confirmed special issue indicator to the contention(s) before the claim can transferred to the Jackson RO for processing. The station must leave the rating end product (EP) pending, as well as all other EPs not related to the radiation claim. The Jackson RO will have jurisdiction of all non-radiation-related claims while processing the radiation issues.Upon receipt of the claim, the Jackson RO will
|
VIII.iii.4.B.2.c. Criteria to Consider Before Beginning Development of a Claim Based on Exposure to Ionizing Radiation | If a claim is received for SC for a disability caused by exposure to ionizing radiation and the claim is substantially complete, the development activity reviews the claim to
|
VIII.iii.4.B.2.d. When to Obtain Information | In all cases, if a substantially complete claim under 38 CFR 3.311 exists, obtain the information listed in M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iii, 4.B.2.e and f. |
VIII.iii.4.B.2.e. Requesting a History of the Veteran’s Exposure to Known Carcinogens | VA may seek a referral from an outside consultant to ensure the Veteran’s disease(s) resulted from radiation exposure in service.Obtain information on the Veteran’s history of exposure to known carcinogens, to include asking the Veteran to identify
Notes:
|
VIII.iii.4.B.2.f. Requesting Medical Evidence of Claimed Disease | To obtain evidence that demonstrates continuity and symptomatology of the claimed disease(s), request the claimant provide
|
3. Verification of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation Under 38 CFR 3.311
Introduction | This topic contains information on the process of verifying exposure to ionizing radiation under 38 CFR 3.311, including
|
Change Date | December 18, 2019 |
VIII.iii.4.B.3.a. Requesting Verification of Participation in Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Tests | When requesting verification from DTRA of exposure to ionizing radiation due to the Veteran’s participation in an atmospheric nuclear weapons test, send a letter to DTRA that
The letter to DTRA should also include
|
VIII.iii.4.B.3.b. Requesting Verification of Participation in the American Occupation of Hiroshima or Nagasaki Prior to July 1, 1946 | When requesting verification from DTRA of exposure to ionizing radiation as a result of participation in the American occupation of Hiroshima or Nagasaki, Japan, prior to July 1, 1946, send a letter to DTRA that provides the following information:
|
VIII.iii.4.B.3.c. Requesting Verification of Involvement in Non-U.S. Nuclear Bomb Tests | PL 103-446 allows for a presumption of SC for the same radiogenic diseases, regardless of whether the Veteran participated in U.S or non-U.S. nuclear tests.Use the table below to obtain verification of a Veteran’s involvement in non-U.S. nuclear bomb tests.
|
VIII.iii.4.B.3.d. Requesting Verification of Exposure to Radiation in Japan Following the March 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami | The Department of War (DOW) established the Operation Tomodachi Registry (OTR) following the March 11, 2011, earthquake and tsunami in Japan. These events caused severe damage to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, which resulted in the release of radiation into the environment. To obtain information on who is included in the registry, contact the OTR staff through DoD’s Environmental Health Surveillance Registries site, under the OPERATION TOMODACHI tab. Important:
|
VIII.iii.4.B.3.e. Requesting Verification of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation by Reason of Military Duties | For a claim based on exposure to ionizing radiation by reason of the nature of military duties, such as a radiologist or an x-ray technician, prepare a separate Personnel Information Exchange System (PIES) request to obtain a copy of the record of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation from the
|
VIII.iii.4.B.3.f. Obtaining Records of Occupational Exposure to Radiation From the Veteran’s Service Department | Each branch of service maintains a record of its service members’ occupational exposure to radiation. If evidence of occupational radiation exposure, such as a DD Form 1141, NAVMED 6470/10, NAVMED 6470/11, or NRC Form 5, cannot be found in the Veteran’s records or obtained through PIES, prepare a written request for the record. Include the identifying data as required by M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iii, 4.B.3.b in the request and send it to the appropriate service department. The table below lists the addresses and telephone numbers to use to obtain records of occupational exposure to radiation from each branch of service.
|
VIII.iii.4.B.3.g. Obtaining Records of Occupational Exposure to Radiation From the AEC | There are instances where military personnel were assigned to the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) laboratories during the testing period and badged by the AEC facility. Include a search of the DoE central records repository as a part of a comprehensive search for records of occupational exposure to radiation. Send requests for such a search to the following address:Address for records from 1945 through present only:U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration – Nevada Site Office P.O. Box 98518 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8518Telephone: (702) 295-3521Address for records from 1987 to present:U.S. Department of Energy Office of Health and Safety Stop AU-10/GTN ATTN: Dr. Patricia Worthington 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585Telephone: (301) 903-5926 |
VIII.iii.4.B.3.h. Obtaining Records of Occupational Exposure to Radiation From USAPHC | The U.S. Army Public Health Command (USAPHC) military exposure surveillance library documents occupational and environmental exposures at military base camps through Periodic Occupational Environmental Monitoring Summaries (POEMS).The summaries
|
4. Obtaining Dosimetry Information
Introduction | This topic contains information on obtaining dosimetry information, including
|
Change Date | December 4, 2015 |
VIII.iii.4.B.4.a. Obtaining Dosimetry Information From DTRA for Atmospheric Tests, Hiroshima or Nagasaki Occupation, or POW Interment in Japan | For claims involving U.S. atmospheric nuclear weapons tests, occupation of Hiroshima or Nagasaki, or POW interment in Japan, send a request for dosimetry information to theDefense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) ATTN: RD-NTSD Stop 6201 8725 John J. Kingman Rd. Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060-6201The letter to DTRA must contain the following information:
|
VIII.iii.4.B.4.b. Obtaining Dosimetry Information for Individuals Outside the Scope of DTRA’s NTPR Program | Use the table below to determine the appropriate action to take for individuals outside the scope of DTRA’s Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) program.
|
VIII.iii.4.B.4.c. Data to Include in the Letter to the Service Department Requesting Dosimetry Information | The letter to the service department point of contact requesting dosimetry information should include the following:
|
VIII.iii.4.B.4.d. Handling Claims Based on Radiation Exposure in or Around Camp Hanford, Washington | Use the table below to determine how to handle claims based on radiation exposure in or around Camp Hanford, Washington.
|
VIII.iii.4.B.4.e. Definition: Not Exposed | Notexposed means
|
VIII.iii.4.B.4.f. Definition: Zero Dose | Zerodose means there was potential for exposure to radiation, but the dose received was zero. |
VIII.iii.4.B.4.g. Handling Dose Estimates of Not Exposed or Zero | If the dose estimate received from DTRA is not exposed or zero, then do not submit the case to Compensation Service.Refer these claims to the rating activity for a decision on the issue of SC for residuals of radiation exposure. |
5. Referring Claims to Compensation Service
Introduction | This topic contains information on referring claims to Compensation Service, including
|
Change Date | October 6, 2021 |
VIII.iii.4.B.5.b. Process for Referring Claims to Compensation Service | The table below describes the process for referring a claim based on exposure to ionizing radiation to Compensation Service.Note: It is not necessary to obtain the concurrence of the VSCM, PMCM, or their designee prior to referring a radiation claim to Compensation Service.
|
VIII.iii.4.B.5.c. Required Memorandum for Referral to Compensation Service of a 38 CFR 3.311 Claim | When referring a claim based on exposure to ionizing radiation to Compensation Service prepare a memorandum in the format shown below.
|
VIII.iii.4.B.5.d. Procedures for Referring Claims to Compensation Service | Follow the procedures in the table below to request Compensation Service assistance with a radiation claim. Important: Prior to sending a request for Compensation Service assistance,
|
6. Exhibit 1: Exposure to Nuclear Radiation and DoD Secrecy Agreement
Change Date | September 5, 2008 |
VIII.iii.4.B.6.a. Exposure to Nuclear Radiation and DoD Secrecy Agreement | The Exposure to Nuclear Radiation and DoD Secrecy Agreement is shown below.
|
Source: VA M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, M21-1, Part VIII, Subpart iii, Chapter 4, Section B (U.S. government work, reproduced for reference). Browse all sections →