M21-1 Manual / Part XIV, Chapter 4, Section D

Federal Tax Information (FTI)_ Income Verification Match (IVM)

M21-1, Part XIV, Chapter 4, Section D

Overview

In This Section

This section contains the following topics:

Topic	Topic Name
1	IVM Procedures
2	Income Verification
3	Initial Verification Requests
4	Operational Performance and Establishing Controls
5	Initial Screening
6	Effective Dates and Adjustment for Parents’ Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) Due to IVM
7	Differing Responses From Payer and Recipient
8	Income Payer Response Only
9	Income Recipient Response Only
10	No Response From Payer or Recipient Within 60-Day Period
11	Recipient Claims Income Belongs to Someone Else
12	Efforts to Clarify Disputed Amounts
13	Due Process
14	Considering Earnings in Individual Unemployability (IU) and Pension Claims
15	Exhibit: Sample IVM Worksheet

1. IVM Procedures

Introduction

This topic contains information on income verification, including

processing IVM Reports, and
independent verification and due process.

Change Date

May 26, 2022

XIV.4.D.1.a. Processing IVM Reports

The table below outlines the steps the pension management centers (PMCs) must follow when processing Income Verification Match (IVM) reports.

Step	Action
1	The PMC reviews the initial reports, including individual unemployability (IU) recipients. *Reference*: For more information on initial screening of IVM reports, see M21-1, Part XIV, 4.D.5.
2	Are verification of income and further development needed? If yes, then the PMC develops for information needed to verify the income information. If no, then the PMC takes action as shown in M21-1, Part XIV, 4.D.5.a.
3	Will benefits be reduced or terminated based on the results of the development? If yes, then the PMC initiates due process for pension-related issues under end product (EP) 154, or refers cases involving IU to the station of jurisdiction (SOJ) for due process and any necessary rating action. If no, then the PMC clears the appropriate EP 154 or 314 removes the IVM file indicator, and sends a decision letter to the beneficiary advising that benefits will remain unchanged.

XIV.4.D.1.b. Independent Verification and Due Process

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) handles the IVM differently from other matches.

In other matches, VA can combine the statutory independent verification and notice requirements into one step with the notice of proposed adverse action letter. With IVMs, VA must complete an income verification process before sending the notice of proposed adverse action letter.
Do not confuse the 30-day verification response period with the 60-day due process period.

2. Income Verification

Introduction

This topic contains information on income verification, including

written confirmation
neither recipient or payer respond, and
payer will not furnish information.

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.2.a. Written Confirmation

Verification requirements are considered met if VA receives written confirmation from either the income recipient or the income payer. Important: The income recipient can be either the beneficiary/claimant or the spouse of the beneficiary.

XIV.4.D.2.b. Neither Recipient or Payer Respond

VA must make reasonable efforts to verify Internal Revenue Service (IRS) return information from a source independent of the IRS. If neither the income recipient or payer responds and the income recipient was either the VA beneficiary or the spouse of the beneficiary, the requirement is considered met if VA made a good faith effort to contact the respective payees. Note: An attempt must have been made to contact the income payer if the income recipient was the VA beneficiary.

XIV.4.D.2.c. Payer Will Not Furnish Information

If a response is received that essentially states that the payer will not furnish the information requested, the verification requirement has been met. Reference: For more information on the efforts to clarify disputed amounts, see M21-1, Part XIV, 4.D.12.

3. Initial Verification Requests

Introduction

This topic contains information on initial verification requests, including

earned income
- payer letters, and
- recipient letters
unearned income
- payer letters, and
- recipient letters
incompetent payees
worksheets, and
workload control.

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.3.a. Earned Income Payer Letters

The Hines Information Technology Center (ITC) sends letters directly to payers of earned income. Payer letters request verification of income for the

tax year of the match, and
following two years.

XIV.4.D.3.b. Earned Income Recipient Letters

Letters to recipients of earned income are bulk mailed to PMCs for screening and release. Recipient letters list payers and amounts reported and ask recipients for certification. Important: PMCs should not release recipient letters if the income has already been reported or if it will not affect entitlement to VA benefits.

XIV.4.D.3.c. Unearned Income Payer Letters

Hines ITC does not send payer letters directly to payers of unearned income. Unearned income payers, including payers of retirement income, must be contacted by PMCs in letter format, similar to the letters automatically sent to payers of earned income. Send these letters upon receipt of the IVM worksheet. Important: PMCs should not release payer letters if the income has already been reported or if it will not affect entitlement to VA benefits.

XIV.4.D.3.d. Unearned Income Recipient Letters

Hines ITC bulk mails letters for recipients of unearned income to PMCs for screening and release. Important: PMCs should not release recipient letters if the income has already been reported or if it will not affect entitlement to VA benefits.

XIV.4.D.3.e. Incompetent Payees

Hines ITC does not send a verification letter to a recipient or a recipient’s spouse if the corporate record shows the beneficiary is incompetent and not paid directly. Hines ITC will, however, send letters to the payers of earned income in these types of cases. Reference: For more information on instructions and limitations on fiduciary contacts, see M21-1, Part XIV, 4.B.4.

XIV.4.D.3.f. Worksheets

At the same time the Hines ITC sends letters, it produces worksheets and refers them to PMCs for matched cases. If there is more than one income recipient (for example, beneficiary and spouse) there is a separate worksheet section for each person’s income. Reference: For a sample of an IVM worksheet, see M21-1, Part XIV, 4.D.15.

XIV.4.D.3.g. Workload Control

The Hines ITC releases cases to PMCs on a priority basis as directed by VA Central Office (CO).

Priority 1 includes cases where
- income reported to the IRS exceeds income reported to VA, income for VA purposes, by $10,000 or more, and
- all individual unemployability (IU) cases, and
Priorities 2 through 10 decrease in $1,000 decrements, for example
- Priority 2 includes cases in which income falls within $9,000 - $9,999, and
- Priority 3 includes cases in which income falls within $8,000 - $8,999, etc.

Notes:

CO will inform PMCs of the number of cases in each priority and when they will be released.
Cases where the difference between income reported to IRS and income reported to VA is less than $1,000 are not referred for verification.

4. Operational Performance and Establishing Controls

Introduction

This topic contains information on operational performance and establishing controls, including

EP 154 and 314
establishing an EP, and
suspense date.

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.4.a. EP 154 and 314

Use EP

154 for pension and Parents’ Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) cases, and
314 for IU cases.

EP 154 or 314 is allowed for each VA beneficiary for whom a worksheet is reviewed, regardless of whether development is required. In unusual situations, where multiple worksheets are generated at one time because of numerous payers, only one EP is allowed. Notes:
When worksheets are received for dependents of a payee (e.g., spouse of a Veteran in receipt of pension), only one EP 154 is warranted for all worksheets reviewed in computing the Veteran’s countable income.
Do not use EP 600 when a notice of proposed adverse action is sent. Continue to control the case using the existing EP.
If a new worksheet is generated based on a later tax year, do not clear the EP 314 or 154 and establish a new EP 314 or 154. All worksheets should be worked under the original EP.

XIV.4.D.4.b. Establishing an EP

Establish an EP when the worksheet is received. Use date of receipt of the worksheet as date of claim.

XIV.4.D.4.c. Suspense Date

The suspense date is automatically set for 60 days. Leave the EP pending until final action is taken.

5. Initial Screening

Introduction

This topic contains information on initial screening, including

verification of income not required
verification and further development unnecessary
when EP 154 or 314 are taken, and
verification of income and employment needed.

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.5.a. Verification of Income Not Required

When the worksheet is received, compare information on this sheet with information in the corporate record and/or claims folder. Verification of income and further development are not required if any one of the following applies:

The only income recipient is the beneficiary’s spouse and the spouse’s income was not a factor for the year(s) involved.
The Veteran receives IU benefits and
VA Form 21-4140,Employment Questionnaire
is of record for the period covered by the worksheet
shows earnings and employment information that is in substantial agreement with what the Veteran previously reported, and
was reviewed by the rating activity.

Note: Do not consider amounts received from participation in the Veterans Health Administration’s (VHA’s) Compensated Work Therapy (CWT) Program as income for pension or IU purposes.

XIV.4.D.5.b. Verification and Further Development Unnecessary

If verification and further development are unnecessary, take the following actions:

clear the appropriate EP 154 or 314 and dispose of the worksheet under the appropriate Administrative Support Staff directive
send a decision letter to the VA beneficiary advising that benefits will remain unchanged, and
annotate the copy of this decision letter to show that EP 154 or 314, as appropriate, was cleared and note the current date.

XIV.4.D.5.c. EP 154 or 314 Are Taken

If an income verification form is received and the claims folder reveals that EP 154 or 314 was cleared, dispose of this form under the appropriate Administrative Support Staff directive.

XIV.4.D.5.d. Verification of Income and Employment Needed

If verification of income and employment is needed:

review the worksheet to determine if the PMC must initiate verification letters (unearned income or incompetent beneficiary), and
store the worksheet in accordance with M21-1, Part XIV, 4.B.2.

6. Effective Dates of Adjustment for Pension and Parents’ DIC Due to IVM

Introduction

This topic contains information on effective dates of adjustment for pension and Parents’ DIC, including

effective date for pension and Parents’ DIC, and
both payer and recipient verify VA information.

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.6.a. Effective Date for Pension and Parents’ DIC

The effective date of reduction or termination is the first of the month following the month the income was first received. In the notice of proposed adverse action, ask the beneficiary to furnish VA with the date income was first received. Note: If the income payer or income recipient does not furnish the specific date that the income was first paid, but shows the calendar year it was paid, assume that it was received in January and propose to adjust effective February 1.

XIV.4.D.6.b. Both Payer and Recipient Verify VA Information

If both the payer and the income recipient respond within the 30-day waiting period verifying the information VA received from the match, send a notice of proposed adverse action based on the income recipient’s report. Note: If there is only one income year, there is no need to mention the reply from the payer.

7. Differing Responses From Payer and Recipient

Introduction

This topic contains information on differing responses from payer and recipient, including

differing response procedures, and
example of handling differing responses.

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.7.a. Differing Response Procedures

Use the table below to determine what to do when receiving differing responses from the payer and the recipient, including the spouse of the beneficiary.

If …	Then …
the income recipient verifies more income than the match amount, or the amount verified by the payer	send a notice of proposed adverse action based on the recipient verified amount.
the income recipient reports less income than the income payer reports, and the recipient’s report would result in the termination of benefits	send a notice of proposed adverse action based on the recipient’s report.
the payer verifies the matched amount, and the recipient reports some income, but less than the matched amount	send a notice of proposed adverse action based on the higher verified payer amount. *Note*: In the notice of proposed adverse action, give the beneficiary the opportunity to provide evidence to support the claim of lower income.
the match amount would result in termination of benefits, and both the recipient and payer verify significantly less income that would not result in termination (for example, the match amount is $10,000 but $2,000 is verified)	send a notice of proposed adverse action based upon the higher amount. *Note*: In the notice of proposed adverse action, give the beneficiary the opportunity to provide evidence to support the claim of lower income.
the match amount would not result in termination of benefits, and both the recipient and payer verify less income than the match amount, and the payer verifies more than the income recipient	send a notice of proposed adverse action based upon the higher payer amount, and provide the beneficiary the opportunity to provide evidence to support the claim of lower income. *Note: Accept the payer report as accurate, disregarding the difference between that amount and the match amount unless you have reason to believe that the payer has misreported*. If you have reason to believe the payer report is inaccurate, take further action to verify the match amount.

Reference: For more information on the efforts to clarify disputed amounts, see M21-1, Part XIV, 4.D.12.

XIV.4.D.7.b. Example: Handling Differing Responses

Situation:
The match amount shows that the Veteran received $5,000 earnings from the XYZ Company during 2007. This amount would not result in the termination of benefits.
The XYZ Company verifies $4,000.
The Veteran verifies $3,000.
Result:
Disregard the difference between $4,000 and $5,000 and send a notice of proposed adverse action based on $4,000.
Provide the beneficiary the opportunity to provide evidence to support the claim of lower income.
Finalize action based on the $4,000 figure, if no additional evidence is received at the end of the adverse action proposal period.

8. Income Payer Response Only

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.8.a. Payer’s Report Only

When the income payer responds, but the recipient does not respond to the income match query, send a notice of proposed adverse action based on the payer’s report. Reference: For more information on the efforts to clarify disputed amounts, see M21-1, Part XIV, 4.D.12.

9. Income Recipient Response Only

Change Date

May 26, 2022

XIV.4.D.9.a. Response to FTI Match

Use the guidelines in the table below when

the income recipient, including the spouse of a beneficiary, responds, but
the income payer does not respond to the Federal tax information (FTI) match query.

If the income recipient …	Then …
confirms the match data reports a lesser amount that would terminate benefits, or reports more income than was disclosed by the match	send a notice of proposed adverse action based on the income recipient’s report.
reports less income than the match data and does not provide evidence to support the reported income (for example, incorrect Social Security Number or corrected IRS form or W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, etc.), *and* the reported amount will not terminate benefits	send a notice of proposed adverse action based on the higher match data. *Note*: In the notice of proposed adverse action, give the beneficiary the opportunity to provide evidence to support the claim of lower income.
reports less income than the match data and does provide evidence to support the reported income, *and* the reported amount will not terminate benefits	send a notice of proposed adverse action based on the income recipient’s report.
denies receipt of the income, *and* furnishes proof showing the FTI is incorrect (did not receive the income)	notify the beneficiary that benefits will not be adjusted, and clear EP 154.
denies receipt of the income, and does not furnish proof to show the report is incorrect	send a notice of proposed adverse action based on the higher match data. *Note: In the notice of proposed adverse action, give the beneficiary the opportunity to provide evidence to support the claim of lower income Reference*: For more information on the efforts to clarify disputed amounts, see M21-1, Part XIV, 4.D.12.

10. No Response From Payer or Recipient Within 30-Day Period

Introduction

This topic contains information on handling no response from payer or recipient within the 30-day period, including

when to take adverse action
payer will not furnish the information
verification process is complete, and
beneficiary responds.

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.10.a. When to Take Adverse Action

Do not take adverse action until a reasonable income verification process is completed. If VA has made a good faith effort with no response from payer or recipient, the verification process is considered completed under the conditions described in the table below.
When … Then the verification process is complete when …
the income recipient is not the beneficiary
a verification letter is sent to the recipient or to each of the recipient's income payers, and
the 30-day response period has expired.
the income recipient is the beneficiary
a verification letter is sent to each of the recipient’s income payers, and
the 30-day response period has expired.
Note: Sending a verification letter only to the beneficiary does not meet the reasonable income verification criteria.
both the beneficiary and the spouse are income recipients
a verification letter is sent to the recipients and to the recipients’ income payers, and
the 30-day response period has expired.

XIV.4.D.10.b. Payer Will Not Furnish the Information

If a response is received that indicates that the payer will not furnish the information, consider the verification process complete and adjudicate the claim based on the evidence of record.

XIV.4.D.10.c. Verification Process Is Complete

Once the verification process is complete

send a notice of proposed adverse action based on the match amount, giving the beneficiary an opportunity to provide evidence to show that the information is incorrect, and
inform the beneficiary that if no evidence is furnished to challenge this income information, VA will adjust or terminate benefits as indicated.

XIV.4.D.10.d. Beneficiary Responds

Use the table below to determine what action to take once the beneficiary responds.

If the beneficiary reports a …	Then take award action based on the …
lower level of income with acceptable supporting evidence or confirms the match income lower level of income that results in termination of benefits, or higher level of income	beneficiary's evidence and/or report.
lower level of income not resulting in termination, and does not provide supporting evidence	FTI and send a notice of proposed adverse action letter.

11. Recipient Claims Income Belongs to Someone Else

Introduction

This topic contains information on recipient claims that income belongs to someone else, including

income statement
when there is no response within 60 days
jointly owned property
funds paid or credited to the recipient, and
handling reports of identity theft.

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.11.a. Income Statement

Instances may arise where the income recipient indicates that income identified by the match was

the income of another person, possibly a relative, or
shared jointly between the recipient and the other person.

In these situations, ask the income recipient to furnish a statement from the financial institution or other source of the income. The statement should show the names of the owner or owners of the funds or property which generated the income during the time frames in question.
Provide 60 days for a response.

XIV.4.D.11.b. When There Is No Response Within 60 Days

If no response is received within 60 days, treat the income as that of the income recipient.

XIV.4.D.11.c. Jointly Owned Property

If the income recipient submits a statement from the financial institution or other source of the income showing that the income recipient and another person or persons jointly owned the property generating the income, count only the income recipient’s proportional share of the income on partial transfer of property by a claimant. Reference: For more information on partial transfer of property by a claimant, see M21-1, Part IX, Subpart iii, 1.I.10.

XIV.4.D.11.d. Funds Paid or Credited to Recipient

If funds were paid to the income recipient or credited to the income recipient’s account, the income recipient’s proportional share of the income must be counted in determining eligibility for VA benefits, irrespective of any informal arrangements that might have existed. Reference: For more information on proportional share of income, see M21-1, Part IX, Subpart iii, 1.I.1.

XIV.4.D.11.e. Handling Reports of Identity Theft

If the income recipient reports identity theft, then request the recipient provide proof of the theft. Proof of identity includes, but is not limited to, the following:

documentation of the correct income information the claimant wants VA to consider
evidence that the income recipient placed a Fraud Alert with one of the three major credit reporting companies (Experian, TransUnion, or Equifax)
evidence that an Identity Theft Report was created with the Federal Trade Commission
a police report indicating identity theft
a letter provided by the IRS, including 4491C, alerting the taxpayer's identity may have been compromised, or
evidence from the IRS that the taxpayer submitted IRS Form 14039, Identity Theft Affidavit, to the IRS.

12. Efforts to Clarify Disputed Amounts

Introduction

This topic contains information on efforts to clarify disputed amounts, including

clarifying disputed amounts
when the information provided does not agree with the IRS
when evidence proving IRS or Social Security Administration (SSA) data is incorrect
delay of letter
when the EP is pending
when the criteria are not met for referral to the Office of Inspector General (OIG), and
when a potential fraud case meets OIG criteria.

Change Date

April 16, 2018

XIV.4.D.12.a. Clarifying Disputed Amounts

If the amount of money reported in the IVM is disputed, either in whole or in part, during the verification process or during due process and that disputed amount will adversely affect the amount of VA benefits payable, further efforts should be undertaken to clarify the discrepancy.

XIV.4.D.12.b. When the Information Provided Does Not Agree With the IRS

VA may notify the payer, income recipient, or both, that the information provided does not agree with information obtained from the IRS and request clarification with supporting documentation. Likewise, if the income recipient is the spouse, VA may attempt to verify the information with the VA beneficiary. This could be done by letting the Veteran know the spouse was sent a letter on a given date and that the Veteran should provide information regarding that income.

XIV.4.D.12.c. When Evidence Proving IRS or SSA Data Is Incorrect

If evidence is received proving the IRS or Social Security Administration (SSA) data is incorrect, adjudicate the claim based on the evidence of record.

XIV.4.D.12.d. Delay of Letter

When it is necessary to clarify a disputed amount, if possible, the notice of proposed adverse action should not be sent until the issue is resolved. Multiple notices of proposed adverse action, award actions, and final decison letters may confuse the beneficiary.

XIV.4.D.12.e. When the EP Is Pending

Although the EP must be left pending until the issue is finalized, it should not adversely affect timeliness. If it appears that there will be a long delay while resolving the discrepancy, and the evidence indicates that current benefits are also being overpaid

send a notice of proposed adverse action, and
take interim award action on a verified amount pending resolution of any disputed amount.

XIV.4.D.12.f. When the Criteria Are Not Met for Referral to OIG

If the case does not meet the criteria for referral to the Office of Inspector General (OIG), the claims processor may request that a Field Examiner contact the income recipient and obtain copies of needed income tax returns, supporting documents and any other evidence that might be needed. Reference: For more information on fraud and forfeiture discontinuance provisions, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.A and B.

XIV.4.D.12.g. When a Potential Fraud Case Meets OIG Criteria

If the case is a potential fraud case and meets the criteria for referral to OIG, a field examination could compromise the case as far as the U.S. Attorney or OIG is concerned. The Veterans Services Center Manager shall contact the local OIG to see if they would be willing to conduct any needed investigation. If OIG chooses not to conduct an investigation, the regional office (RO) may request a field examination.

13. Due Process

Introduction

This topic contains information on due process, including

due process requirements
separate income verification
when pension benefits began during the year of match, and
example of due process.

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.13.a. Due Process Requirements

After the income is verified, due process procedures require VA to give the beneficiary a 60-day opportunity period to submit evidence to show why a reduction or termination should not be made. Reference: For more information on due process, see M21-1, Part I, Subpart i, 1.B.

XIV.4.D.13.b. Separate Income Verification

Separate income verification by the income recipient, who is also the VA beneficiary, does not eliminate the need for due process. VA’s agreement with the IRS and SSA states that VA shall provide a notice of proposed adverse action in all cases, no matter who provides the separate verification. This is an exception to the normal rule that a notice of proposed adverse action is not required if the adjustment is based on self-reported information.

XIV.4.D.13.c. When Pension Benefits Began During Year of Match

In cases where pension benefits began during the year of the match, the notice of proposed adverse action must inform the beneficiary that, in the absence of information to the contrary, the income will be annualized over the entire year. The letter also will inform the beneficiary that if the income terminated prior to the effective date of the award, or the amount varied from month to month, the beneficiary should provide evidence to explain the

income termination date, or
monthly income variation.

XIV.4.D.13.d. Example: Due Process

Situation:
September 1, 2007: Veteran is awarded Veterans Pension benefits and shows no interest income.
The 2009 IVM, for tax year 2007, indicates that the beneficiary received $1,500 in interest income.
In 2009, the beneficiary confirms receipt of the interest income.
Result: The notice of proposed action
must include development for the initial year and from all subsequent years to the present, and
advise the beneficiary that VA will count the income for the initial year and each subsequent year unless the beneficiary provides evidence to support a change.

14. Considering Earnings in IU and Pension Cases

Introduction

This topic contains information on considering earnings in IU and pension cases, including

referral of IU cases to ROs
verification of earnings in IU cases
referral of IU cases to the rating activity
determining the need for an examination in IU cases
a rating proposal to reduce benefits in IU cases
considering protected service-connected (SC) evaluations
referral of a pension case for a permanent and total (P&T) determination, and
pension terminated without referral to the rating activity.

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.14.a. Referral of IU Cases to ROs

Only IU cases with earned income over the current poverty threshold are referred to ROs. Note: Amounts received from participation in VHA’s CWT Program are not considered income for IU purposes. Reference: For more information on the U.S. Census Bureau’s poverty threshold, see the U.S. Census Bureau's Historical Poverty Threshold website.

XIV.4.D.14.b. Verification of Earnings in IU Cases

If, after initial review, verification of earnings from employment is needed in an IU case, see the references listed below. References: For more information on
initial reviews, see M21-1, Part XIV, 4.D.5, and
verifying earnings from employment, see M21-1, Part XIV, 4.D.5.d.

XIV.4.D.14.c. Referral of IU Cases to Rating Activity

When verification is received, or after 60 days if no response from payer or Veteran, refer the IU case to the rating activity at the RO of jurisdiction to determine the need for a physical examination.

XIV.4.D.14.d. Determining the Need for an Examination in IU Cases

To determine the need for an examination in an IU case, the rating activity shall review the information submitted by the Veteran and/or the Veteran's employer. If VA Form 21-4140 indicates the Veteran reported the earnings and VA failed to take action, it is an administrative error.

XIV.4.D.14.e. Rating Proposal to Reduce Benefits in IU cases

After all evidence has been reviewed, the rating activity shall prepare a rating proposing to reduce benefits and refer the IU case to the authorization activity. If the rating activity proposes to reduce benefits, follow the provisions of M21-1, Part X, Subpart ii, 3.A. Reference:For more information on handling fraud, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart iv, 3.A.

XIV.4.D.14.f. Considering Protected SC Evaluations in IU Cases

Use the table below to determine when service-connected (SC) evaluations are protected in IU cases.

If earnings began …	Then …
after protection	take no further action.
before protection	complete development is required because benefits are subject to reduction if continuation of the rating is based on fraud or sustained improvement in the SC disability. *Reference*: For more information on fraud, see 38 CFR 3.1(aa)(2).

Reference: For more information on protected evaluations, see 38 CFR 3.951.

XIV.4.D.14.g. Referral of a Pension Case for P&T Determination

PMC employees have the discretion to decide whether or not to refer a pension case, in which earned income is established, to the rating activity for a determination of continued permanent and total (P&T) disability status. Note: Do not refer a pension case for P&T determination if pension can be granted on a presumptive basis for the applicable period in question.

XIV.4.D.14.h. Pension Terminated Without Referral to the Rating Activity

If pension is terminated for earned income and the case is not referred to the rating activity, flash the claims folder for referral in case the Veteran files a supplemental claim. Note: Do not flash the claims folder for referral if pension can be granted on a presumptive basis for the applicable period in question.

15. Exhibit: Sample IVM Sheet

Change Date

November 4, 2016

XIV.4.D.15.a. Sample IVM Sheet

Below is a sample of page one of an IVM sheet.

Source: VA M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, M21-1, Part XIV, Chapter 4, Section D (U.S. government work, reproduced for reference). Browse all sections →