RATEMYVSO | ABERDEEN / EDGEWOOD SULFURIC-ACID REFERENCES Research reviewed September 12, 2026. This is a reference list, not a claim statement, exposure certification or medical opinion. Save or print this page with your browser's controls. EVENT DOCUMENTATION 1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Enforcement Accomplishments Report: FY 1989. Printed page 43, "U.S. v. Dee, Lentz, and Gepp." Search the text view for "Dee, Lentz" to locate the Aberdeen account. Official account of failed sulfuric-acid containment and discharge into a nearby creek. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=2000U909.TXT 2. The Washington Post. Maryland Officials Probing Aberdeen Chemical Disposal. May 1986. News archive. Access may require a subscription. The page displays May 7; its URL is dated May 8. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1986/05/08/maryland-officials-probing-aberdeen-chemical-disposal/52752ca7-ee20-4a6c-9b3e-643d92119ea1/ 3. The Washington Post. The Aberdeen Mess. January 15, 1989. News archive. Access may require a subscription. Find the passage containing "September 17, 1985." https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/magazine/1989/01/15/the-aberdeen-mess/247cede1-62dc-46c9-8387-0ac343a81673/ SITE AND WATER-SYSTEM CONTEXT 4. USGS. Hydrogeologic Data for the Canal Creek Area, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, April 1986-March 1988. Open-File Report 89-387 (1989). Printed page 1 / PDF page 5. Canal Creek standby wells stopped supplying drinking water in 1984 following VOC detections, before the acid release. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1989/0387/report.pdf#page=5 5. ATSDR. Public Health Assessment: Aberdeen Proving Ground, Edgewood Area. May 20, 2008. Printed page 57 / PDF page 64. Distinguishes the wells' 1984 end of use from their later permanent abandonment. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/pha/AberdeenProvingGround/AberdeenProvingGroundFinalPHA052008.pdf#page=64 6. ATSDR. Public Health Assessment: Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen Area (Michaelsville Landfill). June 17, 2008. Printed page 9 / PDF page 16. Describes the main Aberdeen Area's principal Deer Creek surface-water supply. Do not conflate it with the Edgewood setting. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/pha/APGMichaelsvilleLandfill/APG_Michaelsville_Landfill_Final_PHA_061708_508.pdf#page=16 7. Army / EPA. Canal Creek Record of Decision (2009). Printed pages 18-19 / PDF pages 28-29. Drainage context and Building 87 / Pilot Plant complex. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/189012.pdf#page=28 INDIVIDUAL VA BOARD DECISIONS 8. Citation 23048804, September 6, 2023. Oral-cancer residuals granted after mixed occupational exposures, including sulfuric-acid mist. Not Aberdeen. Not an acid-alone causal finding. https://www.va.gov/vetapp23/Files9/23048804.txt 9. Citation 23033011, June 9, 2023. Direct service connection for renal disease granted following individual evidence concerning Aberdeen contaminants. Not a sulfuric-acid or September 1985 spill case. https://www.va.gov/vetapp23/Files6/23033011.txt 10. Citation 26004808, April 21, 2026. Prostate-cancer claim remanded for exposure development and a medical opinion concerning Aberdeen laboratory duties. Sulfuric acid was among the reported laboratory chemicals. No grant; no finding about the 1985 spill. https://www.va.gov/vetapp26/Files4/26004808.txt 11. Citation 0805098, February 13, 2008. Sarcoidosis claim based on alleged battery-shop acid exposure denied without supporting medical nexus evidence. Not Aberdeen. Not a categorical medical finding about everyone exposed to acid. https://www.va.gov/vetapp08/files1/0805098.txt LIMITS The event sources do not establish a particular person's exposure, dose or medical nexus. The water-system reports do not establish every building's water quality in every historical year. No reviewed Board decision establishes compensation for exposure to the September 1985 spill or confirms contaminated drinking water in 1987. Board decisions are individual and nonprecedential. The 125 mention count in the Sulfuric acid section comes from a local corpus searched September 12, 2026. It is neither an exposure count nor a success rate. The separate April 2026 case was found on the VA site and is absent from that local snapshot.