M21-1 Manual / Part IV, Subpart i, Chapter 2, Section A
Examination Requests Overview
M21-1, Part IV, Subpart i, Chapter 2, Section A
Overview
In This Section | This section contains the following topics:
|
1. General Information on Examination Requests
Introduction | This topic contains general information about examination requests, including
|
Change Date | April 20, 2026 |
IV.i.2.A.1.a. Who May Request an Examination | Development activity personnel have the primary responsibility for requesting examinations. The rating activity may provide guidance as necessary and also has authority to request examinations. In addition, Veterans Service Center Managers (VSCMs), Pension Management Center Managers (PMCMs), or designees may authorize an examination in any case in which they believe it is warranted.Note: When a claim is received that includes one or more automation-eligible contentions, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) uses automation tools to draft and submit examination requests for the automation-eligible contention(s) when warranted. |
IV.i.2.A.1.b. Definition: Appropriate Examination Facility | An appropriate examination facility is a VA examination facility or contract examination provider that can complete the examination(s) required by the specific claim. Regional offices (ROs) have the flexibility to request an examination from the VA medical center (VAMC) closest to where the claimant lives or receives regular medical treatment and/or the designated contract provider. References: For more information on
|
IV.i.2.A.1.c. Mandatory Use of the ERRA Tool | Claims processors must use the ERRA tool when requesting examinations in support of claims for service-connected (SC) compensation, Veterans Pension, and survivors benefits, absent any noted exception(s). VA resources will be utilized to the fullest extent possible in performing examinations, but the use of contract/vendor resources is authorized whenever a VA examination facility has reached or exceeded maximum capacity. When queried, the ERRA tool will identify the
|
IV.i.2.A.1.e. Definition: General Medical Examination | The main purpose of a general medical examination is to screen all body systems and either
|
IV.i.2.A.1.f. Definition: Specialty Examination | A specialty examination focuses on the disabilities that are specifically at issue in the Veteran’s claim. For example, if a Veteran claims that SC hypertension has worsened and an examination is deemed necessary, use the Hypertension Disability Benefits Questionnaire. Notes:
|
IV.i.2.A.1.g. Definition: Specialist Examination | A specialist examination is any examination that is conducted by a clinician who specializes in a particular field. Notes:
|
IV.i.2.A.1.h. Veteran’s Legal Rights at an Examination | A Veteran has no legal right to
|
IV.i.2.A.1.i. Contract Examination Exclusions | Examinations must not be requested from contract examiners under the circumstances specified in the Contract Exam Exclusions List. Use discretion based on RO expertise and consultation with VA Central Office (CO) when determining whether a contract examination is warranted. Important: When an examination cannot be performed by a contract examiner, include a note in the REMARKS field in the Compensation and Pension Record Interchange (CAPRI) examination request. Example: Veteran has filed a claim for [excluded condition] – cannot submit to VBA contract examination provider. |
IV.i.2.A.1.j. Examination Requests for Conditions Affected by Revised Rating Schedule Criteria | When VA issues an amendment to the rating schedule while an initial or increased rating claim is pending, ensure that examination requests (whether initiated through CAPRI or the Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS)) for conditions affected by the amendment include any appropriate condition-specific historical rating criteria language found in the Supplemental Language Matrix. Claims processors must consider historical rating criteria and associated examination results in order to properly decide claims in such instances. Note: This guidance applies equally if/when a rating claim received after a rating schedule amendment was preceded by an active intent to file (ITF) submitted prior to the amendment date. Reference: For more information on the Supplemental Language Matrix, see M21-1, Part IV, Subpart i, 2.A.10.b. |
2. Examination Request Tools
Introduction | This topic contains information about tools used for requesting examinations, including
|
Change Date | August 22, 2024 |
IV.i.2.A.2.a. Overview of Examination Request Tools | The examination request tools listed in this topic allow users to
|
IV.i.2.A.2.b. ESA Tool | The Exam Scheduling Assistant (ESA) tool allows users to answer a series of questions for each contention to receive guidance regarding whether an examination and/or medical opinion is warranted for the contention. Claims processors are encouraged to use the ESA tool during claims development. Important: While the ESA tool is an aid to assist in determining when examinations and/or medical opinions are needed, claims processors are responsible for following guidance in M21-1, Part IV, Subpart i, 1.B to review evidence for the three elements that must be met to necessitate an examination and/or medical opinion. As provided in 38 U.S.C. 5103A(d) and 38 CFR 3.159(c)(4), an examination or medical opinion is not necessary if the evidence of record is sufficient to make a decision for a claimed contention. References: For more information on
|
IV.i.2.A.2.c. ERRA Tool | Examination facilities designated to conduct examinations are found in the ERRA tool. The ERRA tool’s search results include information about the
|
IV.i.2.A.2.d. Interpreting the ERRA Tool’s Results | Use the table below to interpret the ERRA tool’s results and determine the appropriate examination facility to which an examination request should be routed.
|
IV.i.2.A.2.f. Selecting the Appropriate Application for Entering Examination Requests | Use the table below to determine which application to use in preparing and submitting an examination
|
3. DBQs
Introduction | This topic contains information about DBQs, including
|
Change Date | March 1, 2021 |
IV.i.2.A.3.a. Definition: DBQs | Disability benefits questionnaires (DBQs) are documents used to
|
IV.i.2.A.3.b. Use and Acceptance of DBQs for VA Examination and Opinion Purposes | Use of DBQs to record the results of VA examinations and medical opinions is required. However, if there is not a DBQ appropriate for a particular type of examination, or examination results or an opinion is submitted in another format, do not return the report as insufficient for rating purposes on that basis alone. In lieu of a DBQ completed by a VA or contract examiner, decision makers can accept the following, provided the findings and conclusions needed to make the necessary regulatory determinations on the issues (as described in 38 CFR 3.326 and 38 CFR 4.2) are documented:
References: For more information on
|
4. ACE Examinations
Introduction | This topic contains information on ACE examinations, including
|
Change Date | September 24, 2025 |
IV.i.2.A.4.a. Examinations Based on ACE | In lieu of scheduling an in-person examination, VHA and contract examiners generally (subject to some limitations) have the option to complete a DBQ based on review of existing medical evidence. They may also conduct an interview with the claimant. Examinations based upon medical records and history without an in-person clinical examination or testing are known as ACE examinations or the ACE Process. |
IV.i.2.A.4.b. Categories of Examinations for Which the ACE Process Is Prohibited | The ACE Process is not available in the following categories of examinations:
|
IV.i.2.A.4.c. Examination Requests and ACE | When entering an examination request in CAPRI or VBMS, ensure that the examination request
|
5. General Medical Examinations
Introduction | This topic contains information about general medical examinations, including
|
Change Date | September 24, 2025 |
IV.i.2.A.5.a. When to Request a General Medical Examination | A general medical examination containing a full report of complaints and functional impairments is the preferred type of examination for compensation claims involving recent discharge from military service. Request a general medical examination if
|
IV.i.2.A.5.b. When a General Medical Examination Is Not Necessary | It is not necessary to request a general medical examination if
|
IV.i.2.A.5.c. Conducting a General Medical Examination | The examiner conducting the general medical examination should confirm the existence of and evaluate
|
IV.i.2.A.5.d. Citing Medical Conditions to Be Examined | The examination request for a general medical examination should clearly cite the conditions or particular diagnoses that require attention. |
6. Specialist Examinations
Introduction | This topic contains information about specialist examinations, including
|
Change Date | September 24, 2025 |
IV.i.2.A.6.a. Examinations That Must Be Performed by Specialists | Some examinations must be performed by specialists. These examination types include
|
IV.i.2.A.6.b. Who May Request Other Types of Specialist Examinations | In certain circumstances, specialist examinations for other conditions can be requested by
|
IV.i.2.A.6.c. When to Request a Specialist Examination | Request a specialist examination only if it is considered essential for rating purposes.Example: A specialist examination may be requested
|
IV.i.2.A.6.d. Who Determines the Choice of Examiner | The choice of examiners is up to the VA medical facility or contract vendor conducting the examination, unless the BVA remand specifies that the examination must be conducted by a
|
7. Medical Opinions
Introduction | This topic contains information about medical opinions, including
|
Change Date | May 27, 2026 |
IV.i.2.A.7.a. Who May Request a Medical Opinion | Development activity personnel and Military Services Coordinators (MSCs) who have completed training specified by CO are authorized to prepare basic or straightforward medical opinion requests without rating activity review. The VSCM or PMCM will designate categories of opinions that are sufficiently basic or straightforward for preparation by the development activity. However, medical opinion requests of a complex nature, including the following types, must be prepared by the rating activity:
References: For more information on
|
IV.i.2.A.7.b. Referring Claims for Complex Medical Opinion Review | The table below describes the responsibilities of the development and rating activities in ensuring that complex medical opinions are appropriately routed for preparation and entry.
|
IV.i.2.A.7.c. Completing Medical Opinion Requests Using the VBMS EMS With CAPRI | Use of the VBMS EMS is mandatory in all CAPRI medical opinion requests. When requesting a medical opinion in CAPRI, follow the steps in the table below.
|
IV.i.2.A.7.d. Procedure for Identifying the Evidence in a Medical Opinion Request | To identify all pertinent evidence for the examiner to review in connection with the medical opinion requested, in the TABBED EVIDENCE DESCRIPTION field in EMS, provide at a minimum the
|
IV.i.2.A.7.e. Maintaining Objectivity in Medical Opinion Requests | When requesting medical opinions, claims processors should identify all relevant evidence for the examiner’s review, both favorable and unfavorable. However, maintain objectivity when preparing medical opinion requests.
|
IV.i.2.A.7.f. Medical Opinions Required for Remands | When requesting a medical opinion in compliance with BVA remand instructions, follow guidance in M21-5, Chapter 7, G.4.c. |
IV.i.2.A.7.g. Requesting Medical Opinions in Claims Under 38 U.S.C. 1151 | When requesting a medical opinion for a claim involving benefits under 38 U.S.C. 1151, submit the request to the appropriate contract examination vendor in all instances, and use existing VBMS EMS medical opinion templates to generate the appropriate language. Ensure the generated request asks the provider only the specific opinion(s) required by the facts of the case. Important: Do not route medical opinion requests of this nature to VHA. Follow-up examination requests involving evaluations of disabilities for which benefits have been established under 38 U.S.C. 1151 may, however, be directed to VHA. Reference: For more information on disability examinations involving claims under 38 U.S.C. 1151, see the DMA C&P Procedure Manual. |
IV.i.2.A.7.h. Medical Opinions and the Hearing Loss and Tinnitus DBQ | The DBQ for hearing loss and tinnitus contains specific sections for etiology opinions. However, examiners generally are not expected to provide unsolicited medical opinions, and in some types of hearing loss and tinnitus claims (such as claims for an increased evaluation), an opinion may not be routinely required. In any case involving SC for hearing loss or tinnitus where an etiology opinion is required, follow the medical opinion procedures outlined in M21-1, Part IV, Subpart i, 2.A.7.d. Exception: If tinnitus is not claimed, but reported during the course of the examination, examiners will provide this etiology opinion even when not solicited as long as tinnitus is not already SC. For this reason, when preparing any audiological examination and/or opinion request, include a note/comment informing the examiner whether tinnitus is or is not SC. Important: Do not request a separate medical opinion DBQ unless a medical opinion that is not included on the Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Disability Benefits Questionnaire is needed. References: For more information on
|
IV.i.2.A.7.i. Medical Opinions and the Initial PTSD DBQ | The Initial Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Disability Benefits Questionnaire elicits from the examiner information relevant to the Veteran’s contended stressor(s), including an assessment of potential relationship to, and adequacy to support, the underlying diagnosis of PTSD. Because this questioning sequence is inherent within the general PTSD examination protocol, do not routinely request a separate medical opinion DBQ unless a medical opinion that is not otherwise satisfied by completion of the Initial Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Disability Benefits Questionnaire is needed. References: For more information on
|
IV.i.2.A.7.j. Avoiding Asking for Legal Conclusions in Medical Opinion Requests | Do not request that a medical authority make conclusions of law, as this is a responsibility inherent to the rating activity. To prevent confusion, avoid using the word “opinion” when asking the examiner a question about any issue that does not require a formal medical opinion. Examples:
|
8. Examiner Review of the Claims Folder
Introduction | This topic contains information about examiner review of the claims folder, including
|
Change Date | April 20, 2026 |
IV.i.2.A.8.a. Importance of Claims Folder Review | Folder review helps VA ensure that the examiner is given the fullest evidentiary picture possible. The claims folder often contains a history of treatment of the disability at issue. In order to provide an adequate basis for the findings and conclusions of an examination, the examiner needs access to that history. Reference: For more information on sending the claims folder in connection with a VA examination or opinion, see VAOPGCPREC 20-1995. |
IV.i.2.A.8.b. Examinations Requiring Claims Folder Review | For the reasons discussed in M21-1, Part IV, Subpart i, 2.A.8.a, an examiner’s review of claims folder contents is potentially beneficial and encouraged in all claim types. However, for examinations or medical opinions requested by VBA, the examiner must review the claims folder for the following DBQs or claim types:
|
IV.i.2.A.8.c. Requesting Examiner Review of the Claims Folder | Examination scheduling requests (ESRs) prepared using VBMS examination management functionality will generate the necessary language indicative of the need for folder review without further user intervention. |
IV.i.2.A.8.d. Requirement to Identify Relevant Evidence for the Examiner’s Review | Claims processors must ensure that each piece of relevant evidence in the eFolder is either bookmarked or annotated using the functionality described in the VBMS Core User Guide. Important:
|
IV.i.2.A.8.e. Identification of Evidence for Examiner Review in Examination and Medical Opinion Requests Prepared by an Automated Process | When an automated process prepares an examination and/or medical opinion request, relevant evidence for the examiner to review is identified on the ARSD. The ESR will include language directing the examiner to the specific table(s) in the ARSD containing relevant evidence for the contention(s) associated with the ESR.Important: In some circumstances, an automated process will leave an examination and/or medical opinion request in draft status because review by a claims processor is required before the ESR is submitted. In these instances, the claims processor should
|
9. Inputting Examination Requests in CAPRI
Introduction | This topic contains information about inputting examination requests in CAPRI, including
|
Change Date | September 24, 2025 |
IV.i.2.A.9.a. Steps to Request an Examination in CAPRI | Follow the steps below when inputting an examination request in CAPRI.
|
IV.i.2.A.9.b. Completing a CAPRI Examination Request | Fully complete all fields on the examination request screen in CAPRI, ensuring that those discussed below are appropriately populated.
|
IV.i.2.A.9.c. Mandatory Entry of Requester’s Contact Information | Examination requests submitted through CAPRI must include the primary requester’s contact information, to include, at a minimum, a(n)
|
10. ESRs in VBMS
| Introduction | This topic contains information about ESRs in VBMS, including
|
| Change Date | September 24, 2025 |
IV.i.2.A.10.b. Types of Requests Requiring Supplemental Language | Use the Supplemental Language Matrix to identify the
Reference: For more information on entering an ESR in VBMS, see
|
IV.i.2.A.10.c. Definition: Request for Clarification | In the context of VBMS examination management, a request for clarification is a communication from the examining facility, indicating that additional information about an examination request or individual contention is needed. The request generates either an Exam Request – Request for Clarification or Exam Rework – Request for Clarification tracked item, whichever is applicable. This triggers an NWQ event and electronic routing for review and subsequent action by claims processing personnel. When an examining facility generates a request for clarification, its receipt is reflected by a graphic indicator that appears next to the request in the Exam Scheduling Request Summary table view. Example: Reference: For more information on responding to requests for clarification, see
|
IV.i.2.A.10.d. Responding to a Request for Clarification for Vendor Examinations | The response to an examining provider’s request for clarification can be provided with a full edit to the previously submitted ESR, or with a claim- or contention-specific narrative response that addresses specific questions posed, depending upon the nature of the information elicited and the processing stage at which the request is received.The following guidelines must be adhered to when responding to requests for clarification from contract examination vendors:
|
Source: VA M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, M21-1, Part IV, Subpart i, Chapter 2, Section A (U.S. government work, reproduced for reference). Browse all sections →