Veterans Disability Compensation in South Dakota
In fiscal year 2025, 24,031 veterans in South Dakota received VA disability compensation, a +40.3% change from 17,132 in 2019. 20% of them are rated 100% (up from 10% in 2019), and 2,487 are women (1,531 in 2019).
Rating levels in South Dakota, 2019 vs 2025
Share of South Dakota compensation recipients at each combined-rating level. Nationwide, the share rated 100% roughly doubled over this period; see the shift toward higher ratings for the full story.
Shares are computed over recipients whose rating band VA reported (small counts are suppressed). What each level pays: benefits by rating.
Who they are
Of South Dakota's FY2025 recipients with a reported age, 23% are 17 to 44, 34% are 45 to 64, and 43% are 65 or older. 2,487 are women and 19,289 are men.
South Dakota has 230 VA-accredited VSO representatives recorded in the free directory, about 95.71 per 10,000 compensation recipients. See VSO representatives in South Dakota.
Recipients by county
Every South Dakota county VA reported for FY2025, with the FY2019 comparison where the same county existed. "Rated 100%" is that county's share of recipients at the 100% level. "VSO reps" is the count of VA-accredited VSO representatives whose listed ZIP code falls in that county, an approximate, ZIP-based measure; many representatives serve neighboring counties too.
| County | FY2019 | FY2025 | Change | Rated 100% | VSO reps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pennington | 4,081 | 5,242 | +28.4% | 20.9% | 20 |
| Minnehaha | 3,334 | 4,714 | +41.4% | 19.3% | 89 |
| Lincoln | 763 | 1,705 | +123.5% | 21.6% | 7 |
| Meade | 1,140 | 1,695 | +48.7% | 23.1% | 4 |
| Lawrence | 596 | 859 | +44.1% | 22.4% | 0 |
| Brown | 527 | 719 | +36.4% | 17% | 7 |
| Codington | 405 | 635 | +56.8% | 18.7% | 7 |
| Brookings | 417 | 613 | +47% | 16.6% | 4 |
| Fall River | 391 | 598 | +52.9% | 28.4% | 8 |
| Custer | 285 | 517 | +81.4% | 21.7% | 4 |
| Davison | 334 | 503 | +50.6% | 21.3% | 6 |
| Yankton | 330 | 485 | +47% | 19.4% | 4 |
| Union | 249 | 376 | +51% | 20.5% | 0 |
| Butte | 202 | 356 | +76.2% | 20.2% | 3 |
| Hughes | 282 | 340 | +20.6% | 15.9% | 12 |
| Lake | 270 | 294 | +8.9% | 16.7% | 8 |
| Beadle | 223 | 279 | +25.1% | 16.8% | 3 |
| Clay | 199 | 247 | +24.1% | 17% | 0 |
| Turner | 160 | 243 | +51.9% | 15.6% | 3 |
| Roberts | 174 | 197 | +13.2% | 19.8% | 3 |
| Day | 114 | 178 | +56.1% | 20.2% | 6 |
| Grant | 146 | 174 | +19.2% | 21.8% | 4 |
| Hutchinson | 96 | 163 | +69.8% | 19% | 1 |
| Oglala Lakota | 146 | 159 | +8.9% | 18.9% | 0 |
| Charles Mix | 136 | 155 | +14% | 16.1% | 3 |
| Bon Homme | 99 | 143 | +44.4% | 11.9% | 0 |
| Kingsbury | 85 | 133 | +56.5% | 14.3% | 0 |
| McCook | 92 | 131 | +42.4% | 17.6% | 2 |
| Moody | 96 | 129 | +34.4% | 21.7% | 0 |
| Hamlin | 95 | 110 | +15.8% | 18.2% | 0 |
| Walworth | 99 | 105 | +6.1% | 19% | 0 |
| Brule | 68 | 102 | +50% | 11.8% | 6 |
| Spink | 93 | 99 | +6.5% | 19.2% | 0 |
| Deuel | 79 | 97 | +22.8% | 14.4% | 0 |
| Gregory | 87 | 91 | +4.6% | 19.8% | 0 |
| Hanson | 95 | 91 | -4.2% | 15.4% | 0 |
| Tripp | 69 | 80 | +15.9% | n/a | 0 |
| Stanley | 54 | 75 | +38.9% | 21.3% | 0 |
| Dewey | 64 | 73 | +14.1% | 21.9% | 0 |
| Todd | 86 | 71 | -17.4% | 18.3% | 0 |
| Perkins | 59 | 70 | +18.6% | n/a | 0 |
| Aurora | 47 | 65 | +38.3% | 24.6% | 3 |
| Clark | 49 | 65 | +32.7% | 18.5% | 0 |
| Sanborn | 24 | 64 | +166.7% | n/a | 0 |
| Lyman | 40 | 62 | +55% | n/a | 0 |
| Marshall | 53 | 62 | +17% | 19.4% | 3 |
| Hand | 53 | 59 | +11.3% | n/a | 0 |
| Jerauld | 42 | 55 | +31% | 25.5% | 0 |
| Miner | 31 | 55 | +77.4% | n/a | 0 |
| Douglas | 38 | 50 | +31.6% | n/a | 0 |
| Edmunds | 46 | 50 | +8.7% | n/a | 0 |
| Corson | 42 | 49 | +16.7% | n/a | 0 |
| McPherson | 39 | 46 | +17.9% | 26.1% | 3 |
| Bennett | 36 | 41 | +13.9% | 26.8% | 0 |
| Faulk | 28 | 41 | +46.4% | 24.4% | 0 |
| Potter | 41 | 41 | 0% | n/a | 0 |
| Campbell | 20 | 26 | +30% | n/a | 0 |
| Haakon | 19 | 23 | +21.1% | n/a | 0 |
| Jackson | 28 | 21 | -25% | n/a | 4 |
| Mellette | 23 | 21 | -8.7% | n/a | 0 |
| Sully | 22 | 21 | -4.5% | n/a | 0 |
| Hyde | 21 | 20 | -4.8% | n/a | 0 |
| Harding | 10 | 19 | +90% | n/a | 3 |
| Buffalo | 47 | 17 | -63.8% | n/a | 0 |
| Ziebach | 13 | 12 | -7.7% | n/a | 0 |
Free help and related references
Search representatives South Dakota state benefits
See also: federal benefits by rating, VSO representatives in South Dakota, and how ratings shifted 2019–2025.