VA Female Sexual Arousal Disorder Claims: DC 7632 and SMC-K

Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (FSAD) is rated under diagnostic code 7632, part of the gynecological rating schedule added effective May 13, 2018. Like erectile dysfunction in men, FSAD carries a schedular rating of 0 percent, and the code's footnote directs the rater to review for Special Monthly Compensation (SMC) under 38 CFR 3.350. Unlike ED, the regulation does not spell out a specific functional-loss test for female reproductive organs, so how SMC-K applies to FSAD is decided case by case rather than by a fixed rule. FSAD is also almost always a secondary claim, most often tied to PTSD, military sexual trauma (MST), depression, or medication side effects. This guide explains what the VA actually requires, in plain language.

What the VA Counts as FSAD

FSAD is rated under 38 CFR 4.116, the Schedule of Ratings for Gynecological Conditions and Disorders of the Breast, diagnostic code 7632, titled simply "Female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD)." That schedule took effect May 13, 2018, replacing an older, thinner set of gynecological codes.

The VA's clinical picture

Persistent difficulty becoming physically aroused during sexual activity despite the presence of desire, evaluated through a gynecological exam and medical history rather than a mental-status exam alone.

The clinical reality (DSM-5)

The DSM-5 recognizes this condition as Female Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder (FSIAD), and describes it as arising from a mix of physiological, psychological, hormonal, neurochemical, and social factors together, not a purely physical or purely psychological condition.

Some claims-mill articles get this wrong. A few sites claim FSAD "is only a physical condition" and "absent from the DSM-5," and that mental-health clinicians "cannot diagnose" it. That is not accurate. The DSM-5 diagnosis (FSIAD) explicitly spans both physiological and psychological causes, and can be documented by treating clinicians across specialties. Do not let that claim talk you out of using a mental-health treatment record as part of your evidence.
A 0 percent rating can still carry real value. The footnote to DC 7632 directs the rater to review for entitlement to special monthly compensation under 38 CFR 3.350. The diagnosis itself adds nothing to the combined rating. Whether SMC follows depends on what the record shows. See the next section.

The 0% Rating and SMC-K: Where This Gets Genuinely Unsettled

Under DC 7632, the schedular rating is a fixed 0 percent. As with erectile dysfunction (DC 7522), the code carries a footnote: "Review for entitlement to special monthly compensation under 3.350 of this chapter." That is the same referral language used for ED, and it is where any additional compensation would come from.

Here is the part worth understanding clearly: 38 CFR 3.350(a)(1)(i), the regulation that defines "loss of use of a creative organ" for SMC-K, writes out a specific functional-loss test only for testicles, measured by size reduction or a biopsy showing absence of spermatozoa. It defines actual loss (absence) for "ovaries or other creative organ," but it does not write out a parallel functional-loss test for ovaries, and it does not write out one for the penis either. In practice, ED reaches SMC-K through long-standing rater practice and guidance beyond the bare regulatory text. FSAD does not yet have that same well-worn path in the text, so it is genuinely evaluated case by case rather than under a codified formula.

What SMC-K is

A flat, statutory monthly dollar amount under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k), tax-free, added on top of the combined schedular rating. It does not change the underlying combined percentage; it is a separate amount layered above it.

How it is decided for FSAD

Not automatic, and not governed by one written test the way testicular loss is. The rater reviews the C&P exam findings and the medical record for documented loss of arousal function tied to a service-connected cause, then applies 38 CFR 3.350(a) by analogy.

Be skeptical of confident claims about SMC-K here. You may see FSAD SMC framed three different ways online: "granted whenever service connection is granted" (overstated, the reg says "review for entitlement," not automatic), "requires infertility" (conflates ovarian loss of use, which is about fertility, with FSAD, which is about arousal function, a different question), or "requires physical damage generally." The honest answer is that the written regulation does not spell out a specific test for female arousal organs the way it does for testicles, so this is decided on the individual record. Document the functional loss clearly and let the C&P exam and any private opinion speak to it directly.

DC 7632 Rating

The gynecological schedule lists a single rating line for FSAD. There is no percentage ladder for severity, the schedular value is fixed.

0%Female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD)

7632 Female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD). Footnote: review for entitlement to special monthly compensation under 38 CFR 3.350.

Go deeper: open the full FSAD breakdown
  • The 0% schedular line and the SMC cross-reference
  • Evidence and exam tips
  • Secondary condition map
See the full DC 7632 breakdown →
RatingWhat it reflects
0%Female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), the schedular line. Footnote directs review for SMC under 38 CFR 3.350.
SMC-KNot codified with a specific test for female organs; reviewed case by case against 38 CFR 3.350(a) when documented loss of arousal function is tied to a service-connected cause.

If a gynecological exam documents actual physical damage or injury to the reproductive organs (as opposed to a functional arousal disorder), that damage may instead be ratable under a different, organ-specific gynecological code. DC 7632 is specifically for the arousal disorder itself.

How FSAD Gets Service Connected

Direct service connection

Direct service connection requires a current diagnosis, an in-service event, injury, or disease, and a medical nexus linking the two. This is the less common path for FSAD, since the condition typically develops from an underlying cause rather than a single discrete event.

Secondary service connection (the main route)

Secondary service connection is the more common path. Under 38 CFR 3.310, a secondary claim requires a current FSAD diagnosis and a medical nexus opinion tying it to a service-connected condition, or to a medication taken for one, by causation or aggravation.

PTSD, particularly stemming from military sexual trauma (MST), is the pathway most consistently discussed across sources on this condition. In the Board's published record, the volume is small but the pattern is visible: FSAD claimed as secondary to PTSD appears in a small number of published issues, granted at roughly half of decided issues (published BVA decisions). Treat that as a directional signal from a thin sample, not a population estimate. See the PTSD claims guide and MST claims guide.

Beyond PTSD, depression and anxiety, chronic pelvic pain, hormonal imbalance (including thyroid disorders and PCOS), and diabetes are recognized causal pathways in the clinical literature and are argued as secondary theories. See secondary conditions and secondary vs aggravation.

Common Causes and Secondary Conditions

The clinical literature on FSIAD (the DSM-5 name for this condition) identifies several categories of contributing cause, useful for understanding what a nexus opinion might point to:

  • Medical conditions: diabetes, thyroid disease, cardiovascular disorders, liver disease, and neurological conditions.
  • Medications: SSRIs and other antidepressants, tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antihypertensives (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers) are all documented causes of reduced arousal function.
  • Psychological and trauma-related factors: depression, PTSD, trauma (including MST), relationship difficulty, and chronic stress.
  • Neurobiological factors: declining testosterone (notably postmenopausal), and dysregulation of dopamine and serotonin pathways.
  • Other contributing factors: age, menopausal status, obesity, and smoking.
Medication side effects are a distinct, legitimate theory. If you take an SSRI, an antihypertensive, or another medication on this list for a service-connected condition, that medication's known effect on arousal function is a recognized secondary pathway, separate from arguing the underlying condition itself caused it.

Pyramiding and Rating Separately

The VA's pyramiding rules prevent paying twice for the same disability. For FSAD, this rarely becomes an issue because the schedular rating is 0 percent and contributes nothing to the combined evaluation. Any additional compensation, SMC, is layered on top of the combined rating rather than folded into it.

The underlying condition that caused the FSAD (PTSD, depression, a medical condition, or a medication reaction) is rated under its own diagnostic code. The FSAD itself is rated 0 percent under DC 7632, and SMC is considered separately. These are distinct lines, not double-counting.

Evidence That Helps

  • A gynecological or sexual-health specialist's evaluation: documentation from a gynecologist, urologist, or sexual-health specialist who has examined or treated the condition.
  • A nexus opinion addressing both causation and aggravation: a private or treating clinician's opinion stating whether the service-connected condition or medication caused, or made worse, the arousal difficulty.
  • Medication history: a list of medications tried, including any prescribed for a service-connected condition with a documented effect on arousal function, and their effectiveness or side effects.
  • A personal statement: describing onset, how the condition affects daily life, relationships, and well-being.
  • Buddy or lay statements: from a spouse or partner describing observed effects, if the veteran is comfortable including one.
  • Records connecting the condition to MST or PTSD, where applicable: treatment records showing the trauma-related condition's timeline relative to the arousal difficulty.

Common Mistakes

Patterns worth knowing before you file:

  • Expecting a percentage from DC 7632 itself: the schedular rating is a fixed 0 percent. Any additional compensation comes from a case-by-case SMC review, not from the diagnostic code.
  • Assuming SMC is automatic: the regulation directs a review for entitlement, it does not grant SMC automatically upon service connection.
  • Assuming SMC requires infertility specifically: that framing conflates loss of use of the ovaries (a fertility question) with FSAD (an arousal-function question). Document the functional loss itself.
  • Skipping mental-health treatment records because "FSAD isn't a mental-health condition": the DSM-5 diagnosis spans physiological and psychological causes together. Mental-health records, especially PTSD and MST treatment history, are legitimate and often central evidence.
  • Filing as a standalone direct claim with no in-service event and no nexus: the more realistic path is secondary to PTSD, MST, depression, a medical condition, or a medication side effect.
  • Leaving out the medication angle: SSRIs and several other common prescriptions have documented effects on arousal function; this is a distinct theory from the underlying condition.

Diagnostic Evaluation and the DBQ

No lab test changes the schedular percentage for FSAD, which is fixed at 0 percent. Evaluation serves a different purpose: confirming the diagnosis, establishing etiology and nexus, and supporting an SMC review.

  • The C&P examination using the Gynecological Conditions DBQ: the VA Disability Benefits Questionnaire covering female reproductive and sexual health conditions. See the DBQ guide.
  • Gynecological history and exam: documenting onset, progression, and any physiological findings.
  • Review of the primary condition workup: when claimed as secondary, this includes records for the underlying condition (PTSD treatment history, thyroid labs, diabetes labs, a medication list) that supports the causal link.
  • Response to treatment attempts: counseling, medication (such as flibanserin or bremelanotide, the two FDA-approved options for this condition), and any documented effect on symptoms.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does DC 7632 pay a percentage rating?
No. The schedular rating for FSAD under DC 7632 is a fixed 0 percent. The value of a claim, if any, comes from a case-by-case review for Special Monthly Compensation under 38 CFR 3.350, not from the diagnostic code percentage.
Is SMC automatic once FSAD is service connected?
No. The footnote to DC 7632 directs the rater to "review for entitlement" to SMC under 38 CFR 3.350, the same referral language used for erectile dysfunction. It is not an automatic grant. Unlike the testicle-specific functional-loss test written into the regulation, there is no parallel written test for female reproductive organs, so this is decided on the individual record rather than a fixed formula.
Is FSAD a real DSM-5 diagnosis?
Yes. The DSM-5 recognizes it as Female Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder (FSIAD), requiring at least 3 of 6 specified symptoms for 6 months or more with clinically significant distress. It is described as arising from physiological, psychological, hormonal, neurochemical, and social factors together, not a purely physical condition and not something only a physical exam can document.
Why is FSAD almost always a secondary claim?
Because it typically develops from an underlying condition or a medication rather than a single in-service event. PTSD, especially related to military sexual trauma, is the pathway most consistently discussed in the available sources on this condition. Depression, anxiety, chronic pelvic pain, hormonal conditions (including thyroid disorders), and diabetes are also recognized secondary pathways.
Can a medication for another service-connected condition cause FSAD?
Yes. SSRIs and other antidepressants, antipsychotics, and several antihypertensives (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers) have documented effects on sexual arousal function. Under 38 CFR 3.310, FSAD caused or aggravated by a medication taken for a service-connected condition can be claimed as secondary, a distinct theory from arguing the underlying condition caused it directly.
Do I need a gynecologist, or can my mental-health provider's records count?
Both can matter. A gynecological or sexual-health evaluation documents the physical findings, while PTSD, MST, or depression treatment records support the secondary nexus when that is the underlying cause. Do not assume mental-health records are irrelevant just because the rating code sits in the gynecological schedule.

Related Tools and Guides

Sources: 38 CFR 4.116, DC 7632, female sexual arousal disorder · 38 CFR 3.350, special monthly compensation (loss of use of a creative organ) · StatPearls, Female Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder. This guide is educational, not legal or medical advice, and not a prediction of any individual claim outcome. Rating criteria can change. Confirm current details in 38 CFR 4.116 and 38 CFR 3.350. For help with your own claim, talk to a VA-accredited representative.