Original research

The Private-Opinion Edge

A private medical opinion has always helped a service-connection claim at the Board. But across the highest-volume conditions, its edge has nearly tripled in thirty years, from a 16.1-point advantage in the 1990s to 43.5 points today.

+43.5point edge today (2019+)
2.7×the 1990s edge (+16.1)
81.1%granted with a private opinion

The gap has widened decade by decade

Grouping decisions on the 30 most-appealed conditions by decade, and comparing those where the file held a private medical opinion against those with only a VA opinion or none, both grant rates rose over time, but the ones with a private opinion rose far faster:

DecadeWith private opinionWithoutEdge (points)
1992-1999 31.5% (6,222) 15.4% (44,491) +16.1
2000-2009 39.1% (17,925) 16.4% (100,189) +22.7
2010-2018 71.3% (31,524) 29.6% (163,658) +41.7
2019-2026 81.1% (55,421) 37.6% (221,143) +43.5
1992-199932%
private 31.5% vs no private 15.4%, a 16.1-point edge
2000-200945%
private 39.1% vs no private 16.4%, a 22.7-point edge
2010-201883%
private 71.3% vs no private 29.6%, a 41.7-point edge
2019-202687%
private 81.1% vs no private 37.6%, a 43.5-point edge
Why this matters: the baseline (no private opinion) climbed from 15.4% to 37.6%, so yes, the Board grants more now overall. But files with a private opinion climbed from 31.5% to 81.1%, and the gap between them grew from 16.1 to 43.5 points. A private opinion is not just riding a rising tide; its measured advantage in the record has widened.

The trend holds across conditions

It is not one condition driving the pattern. Here is the grant rate with a private opinion, by decade, for the twelve most-appealed conditions, each climbs:

Condition1992-19992000-20092010-20182019-2026
Hearing loss40.3%48.9%75.7%73.2%
Posttraumatic stress disorder32.3%43%72.8%81.9%
Tinnitus, recurrent53.8%54.3%87.9%90.6%
Degenerative arthritis, other than post-traumatic30.5%36.1%70.6%81.6%
Lumbosacral or cervical strain26%31%65.7%80.7%
Hypertensive vascular disease23.4%38.8%59.4%80.8%
Sleep Apnea Syndromes13.3%48.9%81.8%88.7%
Intervertebral disc syndrome30.8%34.1%63.6%78.3%
Diabetes mellitus21.8%31.5%55.5%75.6%
Paralysis of sciatic nerve28.2%36.3%72.4%81.3%
Major depressive disorder34.8%35.9%77.9%85.2%
Arteriosclerotic heart disease21.2%32.5%55.6%69.5%

Methodology

This report aggregates published decisions of the Board of Veterans' Appeals at the issue level, limited to service-connection issues on the 30 highest-volume diagnostic codes. A decision is counted as "with a private opinion" when the record identifies a private or non-VA medical opinion on the nexus question, and "without" when the only medical opinion was a VA examiner's or there was none. Grant rate is granted divided by granted-plus-denied. The private/no-private classification comes from the language of each decision. These figures describe the published record; they are not legal advice and do not predict the outcome of any individual claim. Data as of July 2026; figures refresh weekly.

Cite this research

RateMyVSO. (July 2026). The Private-Opinion Edge: How the Value of a Private Nexus Opinion at the Board of Veterans' Appeals Has Widened Over Three Decades. https://ratemyvso.net/dc/nexus-trend-report

Free to cite and link with attribution. Figures derived from published Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions.

Educational and encyclopedic only, not legal advice, and not a prediction of any individual claim. Figures describe patterns in published Board decisions. For help with a claim, find a VA-accredited representative.