Original research

The Theory Gap: How Grant Rates Vary by Legal Theory

The legal theory a claim is argued on, direct, secondary, presumptive, or aggravation, tracks with how often the Board of Veterans' Appeals grants it. Across 2,260,458 decided issues in the published record, secondary service connection was granted at 41.5%, above direct service connection at 37%.

41.5%secondary connection
37%direct connection
59.3%aggravation

How this research is built: every Board of Veterans' Appeals decision published by VA is public, and anyone can read one at a time. RateMyVSO downloads and analyzes the complete published record, classifying the legal theory argued in each claim, direct, secondary, presumptive, or aggravation, and tracking how often each theory is granted. The result is one of the largest structured research datasets built from the published Board record. It updates automatically every week as new decisions publish.

Updated August 2026

Grant rate by way of establishing service connection

There is more than one way to link a condition to service. A claim can be direct (the condition began in service), secondary (it was caused or worsened by an already service-connected condition), presumptive (the law presumes a link from a qualifying exposure), or by aggravation (service made a pre-existing condition worse). Here is how often the Board granted each, among issues it decided on the merits:

Direct service connection37%
1,062,776 decided issues, granted or denied
Secondary service connection41.5%
139,537 decided issues, granted or denied
Presumptive (toxic exposure)29.8%
84,098 decided issues, granted or denied
Aggravation of a condition59.3%
7,655 decided issues, granted or denied
Reading this: secondary connection was granted about 4.5 points more often than direct in the decided record. Aggravation is the highest but the smallest by far. These describe patterns in published Board decisions; they are not a prediction about any individual claim, and the right theory for a claim depends entirely on its facts.

Conditions most often granted on a secondary theory

Among claims argued as secondary service connection, these fifteen conditions had the highest Board grant rate (of at least 500 decided issues each). Several are classic downstream conditions, sleep apnea, migraines, and depression tied to another service-connected disability:

ConditionDecided as secondaryGrant rate
Tinnitus, recurrent DC 6260 1,530 68.7%
Unspecified depressive disorder DC 9435 571 67.6%
Sleep Apnea Syndromes DC 6847 12,763 61.1%
Migraine DC 8100 4,234 57.9%
Scars, other; and other effects of scars evaluated under diagnostic codes 7800, 7801, 7802, or 7804 DC 7805 667 56.2%
Paralysis of sciatic nerve DC 8520 11,073 53.6%
Posttraumatic stress disorder DC 9411 1,631 51.9%
Erectile dysfunction, with or without penile deformity DC 7522 4,776 51.1%
Gastroesophageal reflux disease DC 7206 2,158 49.1%
Other specified anxiety disorder DC 9410 619 48%
Major depressive disorder DC 9434 4,461 47.9%
Diabetes mellitus DC 7913 2,376 39.4%
Irritable bowel syndrome DC 7319 954 39.1%
Paralysis of median nerve DC 8515 2,262 38.5%
Peripheral vestibular disorders DC 6204 894 38.4%

Other claim types, for context

These are a different question, not how to connect a condition to service, but a rating increase, unemployability, an earlier effective date, or correcting a past error. They sit on their own axis and are shown here only for context:

Increased rating30.1%
717,504 decided issues
Earlier effective date34.4%
151,915 decided issues
Unemployability (TDIU)55.9%
82,218 decided issues
Clear and unmistakable error24.5%
14,755 decided issues
Unemployability (TDIU) grants at a high rate at the Board in part because these appeals reach it only after the underlying conditions are already service connected and rated. Do not read these against the service-connection theories above as if they were the same choice.

Methodology

This report aggregates published decisions of the Board of Veterans' Appeals at the issue level. Each decided issue carries the legal theory the Board addressed (direct, secondary, presumptive, aggravation, increased rating, unemployability, effective date, or clear and unmistakable error). Grant rate is granted divided by granted-plus-denied; remanded and dismissed issues are excluded from the rate. The secondary-conditions table is limited to codes with at least 500 decided secondary issues. Data as of August 2026; the underlying figures refresh weekly.

Cite this research

RateMyVSO. (August 2026). The Theory Gap: Grant Rates by Legal Theory Across 2,260,458 Board of Veterans' Appeals Issues. https://ratemyvso.net/dc/theory-report

Free to cite and link with attribution. Figures derived from published Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions.

Educational and encyclopedic only, not legal advice, and not a prediction of any individual claim. Figures describe patterns in published Board decisions. For help with a claim, find a VA-accredited representative.