VA Claims Research Center

Original, data-driven analysis of the more than 1.8 million published decisions of the Board of Veterans' Appeals. Findings that answer the questions veterans actually ask, drawn from the record, refreshed weekly, and free to cite.

Articles

Periodic, plain-English articles from RateMyVSO Research, grounded in published Board decisions and primary sources.

Pain, weight gain, and sleep apnea: the missing middle in a VA claim, based on 6,591 published Board decisions
Newest article
Pain, Weight Gain, and Sleep Apnea
What 6,591 published Board decisions show about the missing medical links in weight-gain intermediate-step claims.
Article
The Presumption Trap
Veterans raised a presumptive or exposure theory in 242 strictly named GERD issues. The Board record shows what happened, and why IBS and GERD require different claim paths.
Article
Three Doors at the Board
Among 13,157 TDIU issues decided 2021 to 2025, the grant share on the merits was 62.9 percent in Direct Review, 72.8 percent in Evidence Submission and 70.6 percent in Hearing.
Article
The Spicer Split
Board citations of Spicer v. McDonough grew every year since 2023. Across 11,748 decisions, judges split three ways on how they apply it.
Article
The Canceled Surgery That Rewrote VA’s Secondary-Claim Rule
But-for causation is now the standard for secondary service connection, and it reaches conditions a service-connected disability keeps you from treating.
Article
One Opinion, Decided
What 20 recent Board outcomes show about sleep apnea claimed secondary to PTSD.
Article
Barry’s Ripple
How one 2024 Federal Circuit ruling is reshaping the top of the SMC ladder, and where Board judges are quietly splitting.
Article
When a Spouse Isn’t Enough
His wife said she was the reason he could remain at home. The Board agreed that he needed regular help, but still denied the benefit that could pay at the SMC-R2 level.

Original Research Reports

Our own analysis of the published record. Each finding in plain language, with the numbers in the page so they are free to cite.

Live and recurring research

The interactive explorer and the reports that refresh on their own weekly, monthly, and annual cycles.

Research report library

Every published report, preserved in full. Each opens the complete analysis.

63.6 pt gap
The Appeal Gap
The ten most common VA disabilities: how initial-claim approval rates compare to Board of Veterans' Appeals outcomes for the same conditions.
Read the analysis →
37% vs 30%
New Claim vs. Increased Rating
Board grant rates differ sharply between a first-time service-connection claim and a request for a higher rating, for the top 10 disabilities.
Read the analysis →
Top 10
The Exam Problem
Why Board appeals for the ten most common disabilities get remanded, and the C&P exam defect the Board names most often.
Read the analysis →
60.7%
The Missing Nexus
The single most common reason the Board denies service connection is a missing medical nexus. See the split by element and by condition.
Read the analysis →
59 → 20 mo
How Long a Board Appeal Takes
The 2019 AMA reform cut the median wait from about five years to under two. The wait by docket and by condition.
Read the analysis →
352,303 appeals
Choosing a Board Docket
Direct Review, Evidence Submission, or Hearing. What VA's own published data show about how appeals ended in each and how long each is waiting, plus the case law that changed what a Board hearing is worth.
Read the analysis →
41% vs 37%
The Theory Gap
The legal theory a claim is argued on tracks with how often the Board grants it. Secondary connection out-grants direct across the record.
Read the analysis →
45% ↔ 21%
Presumptive & Toxic-Exposure Outcomes
Grant rates for Agent Orange, burn pits, PACT Act, Camp Lejeune, and radiation claims, and the one element most presumptive denials miss.
Read the analysis →
16 → 44 pts
The Private-Opinion Edge
A private nexus opinion's grant-rate advantage at the Board nearly tripled over three decades. The widening gap, by decade and by condition.
Read the analysis →
4.1M Issues
See the 1.9M BVA Cases at a Glance
Every published Board of Veterans' Appeals decision, 1992 to today, and what the full corpus shows about outcomes over time.
Read the analysis →
94%
What Wins at the Board
Grant patterns and winning evidence across conditions, including the 94% grant rate when the medical opinion says "at least as likely as not."
Read the analysis →
38,839
SMC Appeals
Special Monthly Compensation outcomes at the Board, broken down by SMC level, pathway, and the evidence that carried them.
Read the analysis →
16% → 29%
The Rating Shift
The share of veterans rated 100% nearly doubled from 2019 to 2025. The climb in ratings, nationally and state by state.
Read the analysis →
121,000+
DIC Appeals Data
Grant rates for survivor claims at the Board: cause-of-death, accrued benefits, and a 35-year trend that has quadrupled in survivors' favor.
Read the analysis →

Data and Analytics Tools

Interactive data exploration tools drawn from the public record. Explore them yourself and research the raw data on your own.

About this research. These articles and reports are aggregate, encyclopedic analysis of published Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions. They describe patterns in the record; they are not legal advice and do not predict the outcome of any individual claim. The figures refresh weekly as new decisions are published. Every article and report is free to cite and link with attribution.
Prefer one page for everything? The Report Viewer puts every report above, plus live grant-rate, wait-time, and exposure breakdowns, in one two-pane hub.
For help with a specific claim, find a VA-accredited representative. More reports are added as the analysis grows.