Hip Limitation Secondary to Back or Neck Strain Claim Guide

Hip Limitation (VA diagnostic code 5252) is sometimes claimed as secondary to service-connected Back or Neck Strain (code 5237) under 38 CFR 3.310. We analyzed published Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions on that pairing; here is what they show. It is an encyclopedic reference, not a forecast.

Last updated: October 2026 · Educational use only. This page catalogs how published Board decisions handled this claim pairing. It is not legal advice, not a recommendation about your claim, and it does not predict an outcome. Verify current rules at VA.gov or eCFR.

The Numbers, from 1.9M Appeals

We analyzed the Board's published decisions and found hip limitation (DC 5252) claimed as secondary to back or neck strain (DC 5237) is a real, mid-sized claim pool that is an uphill claim once it reaches a merits decision.

6%
Granted, of all 1,112 issues. Among decided issues only (granted or denied), 32% were granted.
1,112
published Board issues arguing hip limitation secondary to back or neck strain
79%
of all issues were remanded, sent back for more development

How those 1,112 issues came out

Descriptive Board data. Correlation is not predictive. This shows how similar filings were decided in the published record, not the odds for any individual claim.
Granted: 69 Remanded: 882 Denied: 144 Other: 17

Counts from RateMyVSO's index of published BVA decisions, as of October 2026. "Granted 6%" is granted ÷ all 1,112 issues, remands included. Counting only issues decided up-or-down (granted ÷ (granted + denied)), 32% were granted. A remand is not a loss; it means the Board needed more evidence before deciding. Secondary service connection rule: 38 CFR § 3.310.

Start with the essentials

  1. 01Service Connection

    The ways a secondary connection can be established for this pairing.

  2. 02Diagnosis and Evidence

    Common symptoms and the evidence cited in published Board appeals.

  3. 03Your History

    What you experienced, what others observed, and what treatment changed.

Understand the claim

ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes for Hip Limitation

The ICD-10 diagnosis codes most commonly used for DC 5252, Hip Limitation (the kind on your medical records, decision letter, or C&P exam report). VA rates the disability and its residuals, not the diagnosis itself, so coding can vary.

M25.551 Pain in right hipM25.552 Pain in left hipM25.651 Stiffness of right hip, not elsewhere classifiedM25.652 Stiffness of left hip, not elsewhere classifiedM25.559 Pain in unspecified hip

See the full diagnostic-code page →

What a secondary claim on this pairing needs

Under 38 CFR 3.310 a secondary claim turns on three elements:

  • A current diagnosis: a medical diagnosis of hip limitation (the secondary).
  • A service-connected primary: Back or Neck Strain, already service-connected (the primary). A 0% primary still counts.
  • A medical nexus: a medical opinion linking the hip limitation to the back or neck strain, showing the primary caused or aggravated it.

See the Secondary Claim guide for the caused-versus-aggravated split, and the Nexus Letter guide for what makes the medical opinion strong.

Why hip limitation is claimed secondary to back or neck strain

Documented mechanism
Back pain changes how a person walks and stands. The altered gait and posture that protect a painful back shift extra stress onto the hip joints, and over time that uneven load can cause hip pain and wear or worsen a hip condition that was already there. It is not automatic: many people with back strain never develop a hip problem, so whether it explains a particular veteran's condition depends on that veteran's own records, including how the back has changed their gait, the hip diagnosis and imaging, and a clinician's opinion that explains the link.
This rationale is generated from the data for this specific pairing, not hand-written per page. The grant and denial figures above come only from the decision data, never from the rationale text.

Whether that medical link exists in any one case is a medical question decided on that case's own evidence (the nexus).

Pairing research and evidence

Symptoms Recorded in Granted Hip and thigh conditions Decisions

We analyzed 1,820 granted Board decisions involving hip and thigh conditions for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.

Bar length shows decisions. Percentages remain context.

Hip pain
1,452 decisions79.8% of granted
Limp or gait disturbance
486 decisions26.7% of granted
Weakness
204 decisions11.2% of granted
Flare-ups
134 decisions7.4% of granted
Stiffness
110 decisions6.0% of granted
Trouble crossing legs
45 decisions2.5% of granted
Fatigability
39 decisions2.1% of granted

Detected by phrase-reading the decision text with condition-specific vocabularies. Source: Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, RateMyVSO analysis.

Caused By vs Aggravated By: What the Board Found

The outcome split above counts whole issues. This section goes one layer deeper. Under 38 CFR § 3.310 a secondary claim can be won two ways: the back or neck strain caused the hip limitation (§ 3.310(a)), or it aggravated an existing hip limitation (§ 3.310(b)). Every grant rests on one or the other, so the numbers below divide up the granted claims only.

69
claims the Board granted on this pairing
58
granted because the back or neck strain caused the hip limitation
11
granted because it aggravated an existing hip limitation
Granted on causation: 58 Granted on aggravation: 11

Direct causation is the route that carries most grants here: 84% of them found the back or neck strain caused the hip limitation, the rest found aggravation. A practical consequence for the nexus opinion: it should address both routes, because a medical opinion that only argues causation leaves the aggravation theory, a separate legal basis, on the table. See the caused-vs-aggravated guide for how the two theories differ.

On the other side: in 65 denied claims the Board looked at this pairing and found no link, meaning it decided the back or neck strain neither caused nor worsened the hip limitation. That is a separate group from the grants above, counted here so the picture is not one-sided.

We analyzed published Board decisions on this pairing to build this split. The grant split covers granted claims only; denied, remanded, and dismissed claims are not in it. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.

What VA Looks For: Tests, Records, and Diagnostic Codes

We analyzed published Board decisions on these claims and ranked the records that appeared most often:

  • A medical nexus opinion: the one record VA weighs most on a secondary claim, a doctor's statement linking your hip limitation to your service-connected back or neck strain and naming the mechanism.
  • Flare-ups and additional functional loss addressed
  • Hip range of motion measured in degrees
  • Hip X-ray or MRI findings
  • Antalgic gait or limp documented
  • Hip replacement (arthroplasty) documented

The diagnostic code involved: DC 5252 (Hip Limitation). The rating levels for this code are in the rating section below.

Records ranked by how often published Board decisions cited them. The exam that captures most of this is covered in the C&P Exam section below. Source: Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, RateMyVSO analysis.

The Evidence That Wins Hip Limitation Secondary Claims

What veterans who win this pairing actually put in the file, and why each piece moves the claim.

  • Hip diagnosis: A diagnosis and imaging of your hip, such as arthritis, impingement, or strain. If there is no diagnosis, records showing hip pain and weakness that limit what you can do. One Board found pain and weakness with functional impairment was enough.
  • Service-connected back: Proof your back condition is already service connected. Every grant here rested on a back condition VA or the Board had service connected.
  • Nexus opinion with a rationale: A medical opinion that explains how the back condition caused your hip problem, such as extra stress on the hip from an abnormal gait. Opinions with no reasoning got no weight.
  • Aggravation addressed: An opinion that also says whether your back condition made your hip worse. The Board set aside a VA exam that gave a conclusory aggravation opinion.
  • Answer to negative opinions: An opinion that names the negative VA opinions and explains why it disagrees. In one grant, the positive opinions that did this won over four negative ones.
  • Gait records: Exam or therapy notes showing a limp, antalgic gait, or compensatory movement. Records showing a normal gait over and over led to a denial.
  • Your own statements: Your consistent reports of pain spreading from your back into your hips. The Board found a veteran competent to describe this, but not competent to give the medical cause.

Evidence Cited in Published Hip and thigh conditions Decisions

We analyzed 42,980 published Board decisions involving hip and thigh conditions for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 47.9%, combining every diagnostic code below. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.

Bar length shows decisions citing the evidence.

Flare-ups and additional functional loss addressed
8,346 decisions68.7% favorable
Hip range of motion measured in degrees
8,192 decisions73.8% favorable
Hip X-ray or MRI findings
6,220 decisions52.3% favorable
Antalgic gait or limp documented
5,193 decisions61.5% favorable
Hip replacement (arthroplasty) documented
5,015 decisions48.9% favorable

By diagnostic code

These codes are grouped together above. They do not perform the same, so find your own code here rather than reading the combined figure. A code retired in the schedule rewrites appears without a link, because its decisions were judged under criteria that no longer apply.

Bar length shows published decisions reviewed.

DC 5252 Thigh, limitation of flexion of
37,752 decisions1,392 granted · 48.6% favorable
DC 5253 Thigh, impairment of
4,319 decisions150 granted · 55.4% favorable
DC 5054 Hip, resurfacing or replacement (prosthesis)
3,635 decisions345 granted · 44.9% favorable

Detected by phrase-reading the decision text with condition-specific vocabularies. Source: Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, RateMyVSO analysis.

Board Grants on This Pairing, Dissected

Read the record, not the odds. These are real published decisions on this exact pairing, summarized to show what evidence was in the file and how the Board weighed it. Board decisions are not binding precedent and none of them predicts your result.

These four Board decisions granted a hip condition as secondary to a service-connected back condition. In three, the Board weighed medical opinions for and against the claim. In one, the Board relied on findings VA had already made. Published Board decisions are not binding precedent. Each one decides only that veteran's appeal, so read them as examples of what the record looked like, not as rules.

Gait opinions that answered the negative exams won Citation A26007502 (January 27, 2026), Evidence Submission docket

The record: The veteran had right hip femoral acetabular impingement with osteoarthritis, after a right hip replacement, and a service-connected lumbar strain with arthritis. A September 2008 orthopedic evaluation noted a mild antalgic gait. Four medical opinions went against him. One from July 2020 addressed only direct service connection. One from December 2020 said a pre-existing pelvis fracture could not be ruled out as the cause. One from July 2023 said the lumbar strain could not cause a hip disability. One from July 2024 was also negative. On the other side, a December 2020 clinician wrote that "it is plausible the abnormal gait noted in 2008 can place additional stress on the hip joint leading to current right hip diagnosis." A May 2022 private opinion, a June 2024 supplemental opinion, and a May 2025 private opinion (filed with the Board appeal) all supported the claim. The decision does not state these clinicians' credentials.

Why it won: The Board found the negative opinions not persuasive because they lacked adequate supporting rationale. The positive opinions showed familiarity with the record, and the June 2024 and May 2025 opinions directly addressed the negative opinions and explained why they disagreed. The Board found the lumbar strain caused the hip condition under 38 CFR 3.310.

VA exam ignored altered gait and was set aside Citation A26025100 (March 19, 2026), Hearing docket

The record: The veteran had left hip arthritis and a total left hip replacement. He was service connected for thoracolumbar spine degenerative arthritis and for a right hip disability. A 2007 VA back exam noted stiffness in the low back and hip area and weakness in both hips. A February 2019 examiner, writing about the right hip, said "[m]edical literature does support that lower back pain can cause an altered gait and posture, which can cause one to place extra strain on the lower extremities/joints such as the hips." A January 2021 VA examiner said one joint does not affect another unless there is major muscle or nerve damage or a leg-length difference causing an obvious Trendelenburg gait, and gave a negative aggravation opinion. In October 2024, the month of his hearing, the veteran filed a July 2023 treatment record in which a physician said his hip pain "appears to be coming from his back."

Why it won: The Board found the January 2021 VA opinion inadequate. The examiner did not consider the February 2019 opinion, did not consider whether altered gait from the back caused or aggravated the left hip, and gave a conclusory aggravation opinion. The Board found the left hip secondary to the service-connected lumbar spine and right hip disabilities.

Hip pain and weakness from the back counted as a disability Citation A26021270 (March 10, 2026), Hearing docket

The record: The Board granted the lumbar strain in the same decision and expanded the appeal to cover the hips. VA records showed shooting pain from the back toward the left hip. A VA physical therapist found reduced strength in both hips and assessed low back pain "with weak hip and core musculature contributing to compensatory movement patterns." At an August 2019 VA exam, the veteran reported sharp pain from the low back into both buttock and hip areas. In a back DBQ the veteran submitted in August 2020, a physician found her low back pain radiating into both hips was the result of her in-service car accident and military duties.

Why it won: The Board found a current hip disability based on pain and observed weakness causing functional impairment. It found the veteran competent to report her radiating pain. It gave the August 2020 opinion substantial weight because it considered her service records and her statements. The Board found the evidence evenly balanced, gave her the benefit of the doubt, and granted both hips as caused by the lumbar strain.

VA's own favorable findings carried the claim Citation A26004258 (January 15, 2026), Direct Review docket

The record: VA denied a right hip claim in June 2024. The veteran filed a new claim for the right hip as secondary to his service-connected lumbosacral strain. In December 2025, VA granted it effective August 13, 2025. The decision does not describe the medical opinions behind that grant.

Why it won: The Board found the December 2025 rating decision made implicit favorable findings on all three elements: a current right hip disability, a service-connected lumbosacral strain, and medical evidence that the strain caused the hip condition. With all three elements met, the Board granted the right hip on a causation basis.

Why VA Denies, and How the Board Answered

The rationales below are the ones VA examiners actually used against this pairing in the published record, each paired with the Board's response.

  • Read the left column first: if a VA opinion in your file uses one of these arguments, that is the reasoning your own evidence has to meet.
  • The right column is the counter: it shows how the Board actually answered that argument, with the decision cited.
  • A rationale appearing here is not a verdict: the same argument won some cases and lost others, on different records.
VA examiner's rationaleHow the Board answered it
The hip conditions are a separate entity from the lumbar spine. Medical literature shows no causal link.The Board accepted it. The examiner examined the veteran and explained the opinion. The Board said calling the conditions unrelated also ruled out aggravation. No medical opinion supported the claim, and the veteran's own view was not competent on this medical question. (A25062463)
The veteran has no antalgic or altered gait, and literature does not link spine disc disease to hip tendinitis.The Board accepted it. Service and VA records noted a normal gait many times. The Board said that without an altered gait, nothing suggested the back caused or aggravated the hips. (A24053931)
Lumbar spine disease is not a known cause of hip pain. The hips are from wear and tear and obesity. A baseline for aggravation cannot be measured.The Board found the opinions adequate and persuasive. The only evidence for the claim was the veteran's own statements, which were not competent on the cause. (A24018639)
The joint problems are inflammatory, from age and genetics, with no mechanical stress from another joint.The Board gave this opinion more weight. A private opinion supported the claim but gave no rationale, so it received no weight. (A25088028)
One joint does not affect another unless there is major nerve damage or a leg-length difference causing an obvious Trendelenburg gait.The Board found this opinion inadequate. The examiner ignored a prior opinion on altered gait, did not consider gait from the back condition, and gave a conclusory aggravation opinion. Service connection was granted. (A26025100)
A lumbar strain cannot cause a hip disability. A pre-existing pelvis fracture could be the cause. One opinion addressed only direct service connection.The Board found the negative opinions lacked adequate rationale. Positive opinions that reviewed the record and answered the negative ones won. (A26007502)

If granted: rating and daily function

If Granted: How Hip Limitation Is Rated

The VA assigns one of these percentages based on what your medical record documents. Plain-language summary of the rating criteria at 38 CFR; the controlling text is the regulation itself.

RatingWhat the record has to show for DC 5252, Hip Limitation
40%You can only bend your thigh (flexion means bending a joint toward your body) up to 10 degrees at the hip joint. This is an extremely limited range of motion - a normal thigh can bend up to about 120 degrees, so this represents severe restriction where your leg remains almost completely straight when trying to bring your knee toward your chest.
30%You can only bend your thigh forward at the hip joint up to 20 degrees. This is a severe limitation since a normal thigh should be able to flex (bend forward) to about 125 degrees, meaning you've lost most of your ability to lift your knee toward your chest or bend at the hip.
20%You can only bend your thigh up toward your body to 30 degrees or less. This means when you try to lift your knee toward your chest while standing, or pull your knee toward your stomach while lying down, your thigh stops moving at about 30 degrees - which is much less than the normal range of about 125 degrees that most people can achieve.
10%You can only bend your thigh forward at the hip joint up to 45 degrees. This means you have significant difficulty lifting your knee toward your chest - normal thigh flexion should reach about 120 degrees, so this represents a major limitation in your hip's range of motion that affects walking, climbing stairs, and getting in and out of cars.

Rating criteria: 38 CFR § 4.71a

Do's and Don'ts

Every item below comes from a pattern in the decisions on this pairing, not from general claim advice.

Do
  • Get a medical opinion that explains how your back condition affects your hip, such as through an altered gait.
  • Ask your doctor to respond to each negative VA opinion and explain why they disagree.
  • Ask that the opinion cover both cause and aggravation (worsening).
  • Point to records that show a limp, antalgic gait, or compensatory movement.
  • Tell your providers when hip pain seems to come from your back, so it appears in your records.
Don't
  • Don't rely only on your own belief that your back caused your hip problem.
  • Don't file a private opinion that gives a conclusion with no reasoning.
  • Don't leave repeated "normal gait" notes in your records unanswered.
  • Don't give different onset dates for your hip pain at different visits.
  • Don't expect the Board to see new evidence on the Direct Review docket. It reviews only what was in the file at the time of VA's decision.

Prepare and take the next step

Prepare: your own working pages

Optional. These are your own notes, in your own words. They are not a VA form, they are not sent to the VA, and nothing here is a medical finding or a prediction about your claim.

Three reminders while you prepare
  1. Keep the two conditions separate

    Record the history, diagnosis, symptoms, and treatment for Back or Neck Strain and Hip Limitation separately before describing the possible relationship. Go to this part

  2. Ask about causing and worsening separately

    A clinician may need to address whether Back or Neck Strain caused Hip Limitation, whether it worsened it, and what other explanations the record shows. Go to this part

  3. Build the timeline from records you have

    Mark missing or unverified records honestly. Research from published Board decisions describes the record reviewed; it does not predict an individual claim. Go to this part

Two-condition timeline

Hip Limitation: symptoms and daily function

Provider questions about the relationship

Records and unanswered questions

Decision-letter reading sheet

Quick Checklist Before You File

  • Service connection already in place for Back or Neck Strain, and a current medical diagnosis of hip limitation.
  • Diagnostic testing, imaging, or clinical records documenting the hip limitation, whatever your provider used to diagnose and track it.
  • A nexus opinion, whenever possible from a doctor familiar with hip limitation, stating it is at least as likely as not caused or aggravated by the back or neck strain, and naming the mechanism rather than just the conclusion.
  • Lay statements: spouse, family, friends, or battle buddies describing what they've witnessed or noticed.
  • Your STRs and any VA opinions already in the file on either condition. If a VA opinion already went against you, your submitted opinion or statement should address its specific reasoning.

For the mechanics of filing itself, see the Standard Claim Guide and the Fully Developed Claim Guide.

The Claims Process, Step by Step

A secondary claim moves through the same pipeline as any other. Understanding who does what helps you know who to contact and what to expect.

  1. You file the claim, naming Back or Neck Strain as the service-connected primary and hip limitation as secondary. Directly with VA, through VA.gov, or with an accredited representative's help.
  2. VA assigns a Veteran Service Representative (VSR) to develop the claim: gather your service treatment records, VA and private medical records, and order a C&P exam if needed.
  3. The C&P exam is conducted, usually with the examiner asked to address the specific secondary theory (causation and aggravation both).
  4. The file goes to a Rating Veteran Service Representative (RVSR), the "rater," who weighs the medical evidence and decides service connection and, if granted, the rating percentage.
  5. VA issues the decision letter stating the outcome and the reasoning.
  6. If denied or under-rated, you choose an appeal lane, Supplemental Claim, Higher-Level Review, or a Board appeal, covered below.

Who's who: VSO vs. VSR vs. Rater vs. C&P Examiner

Your VSO

An accredited representative, agent, or attorney. Not a VA employee. Helps prepare and file, and can represent you on appeal. Has no authority to decide your claim.

VSR

VA staff who develops the claim: gathers records and schedules the exam. Does not decide the rating.

Rater (RVSR)

VA staff who reviews the complete file and makes the actual decision on service connection and percentage.

C&P Examiner

Conducts the exam and, where asked, gives a nexus opinion. Does not decide the claim, but the opinion's reasoning and legal framing carry real weight.

For the full walkthrough, see Inside Your Claim and Claim Stages.

DBQs and Your C&P Exam

A Disability Benefits Questionnaire (DBQ) is the standardized form the examiner completes for your condition. See the DBQ Guide for how these forms work and whether a private DBQ from your own doctor can be submitted instead of relying solely on a VA exam. For what to expect and how to prepare, see the C&P Exam Prep Guide, and be specific about how your hip limitation symptoms relate to your back or neck strain timeline, treatment, and any aggravation, that is the detail a nexus opinion relies on.

Reading Your Decision Letter, and What to Do If Denied

Your decision letter has a narrative "reasons and bases" section and a codesheet with the rating and effective date. See the Reading Your Decision Letter Guide or use the Letter Interpreter tool to decode your own letter. If denied, you have three main lanes:

  • Supplemental Claim: refile with new and relevant evidence, such as a nexus opinion that addresses the mechanism and the specific VA rationale you're rebutting. See Supplemental Claim Guide.
  • Higher-Level Review (HLR): a senior reviewer looks at the same evidence again, useful if the denial rested on a legal error. See HLR Guide.
  • Board Appeal: your case goes to a Veterans Law Judge, with a direct review, evidence, or hearing docket. See Board Appeal Guide.

Not sure which lane fits? See the Appeals decision guide for a side-by-side comparison.

After You Win: Maintaining Your Rating

Keep documentation of ongoing treatment, follow-up evaluations, and any updated diagnostic testing for your hip limitation on file, this protects you if VA schedules a future reexamination. See Protect Your Rating for when a rating becomes protected and Future Reexaminations for what triggers one. If your hip limitation worsens, see the Rating Increase Guide.

References and related resources

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Back or Neck Strain have to be highly rated to support a hip limitation secondary claim?

No. 38 CFR 3.310 looks at whether the service-connected Back or Neck Strain caused or aggravated the hip limitation, not at how severe the Back or Neck Strain rating is. Even a 0% service-connected primary can anchor a secondary claim.

What do the percentages on this page mean?

They are the historical outcomes of 1,112 published Board decisions on this exact pairing: 6% granted, 13% denied, 79% remanded. They describe decided appeals already on record. They do not predict what would happen in any individual case.

RateMyVSO. Educational resource. Not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Not legal advice. All RateMyVSO tools are free. Find a VSO representative for personalized guidance.