Flatfoot (Pes Planus) Claims Guide

Flatfoot, or pes planus, is a fallen or collapsed arch. It is one of the most common VA claims, and one of the most commonly denied, because so many veterans had the condition noted when they entered service. The VA rates flatfoot under diagnostic code 5276, and two rules decide most claims: whether the flatfoot was permanently worsened by service, and how severe the deformity is now. This guide walks the whole path: how service connection works, the entrance-exam trap that sinks many claims, direct and secondary pathways, the DC 5276 rating levels, the evidence that wins, why these claims get denied, a checklist before you file, what the claims process looks like step by step, how to read your decision letter, and what to do whether you win or you're denied.

Last updated: July 2026 · Educational use only. Not legal advice. Verify current rules at VA.gov or eCFR.

Symptoms Recorded in Granted Foot conditions (flatfoot, plantar fasciitis) Decisions

We analyzed 4,036 granted Board decisions involving foot conditions (flatfoot, plantar fasciitis) for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.

Foot or heel painshare of granted 22.3%
n = 901
Marked pronation or inward displacementshare of granted 14.2%
n = 573
Swelling on useshare of granted 10.7%
n = 433
Pain on use or manipulationshare of granted 10.5%
n = 424
Characteristic callositiesshare of granted 7.8%
n = 315

Detected by phrase-reading the decision text with condition-specific vocabularies. Source: Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, RateMyVSO analysis.

ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes

The ICD-10 diagnosis codes most commonly used for DC 5276, Flatfoot, acquired (the kind on your medical records, decision letter, or C&P exam report). VA rates the disability and its residuals, not the diagnosis itself, so coding can vary.

M21.40 Flat foot [pes planus] (acquired), unspecified footM21.41 Flat foot [pes planus] (acquired), right footM21.42 Flat foot [pes planus] (acquired), left footQ66.50 Congenital pes planus, unspecified footM21.6X9 Other acquired deformities of unspecified foot

See the full diagnostic-code page →

How Service Connection Works, At a High Level

Before getting into the entrance-exam trap and the specific pathways below, it helps to understand the three things every VA claim, including flatfoot, ultimately has to show under 38 CFR § 3.303.

  1. A current diagnosis. A doctor has to confirm you have flatfoot (pes planus) now. If the record has no diagnosis, the claim fails no matter what else is true.
  2. An in-service cause or worsening. Something in service must have caused the flatfoot, or made a flat foot you already had get worse. Flatfoot is very often noted at the entrance exam, which changes the whole case, see the entrance-exam trap below.
  3. A medical link (nexus). The evidence must connect your service to your current flatfoot. This can come from a private doctor, a VA examiner, or, in close cases, your own credible statements plus your service records.
Benefit of the doubt. When the evidence for and against is roughly equal, the law gives you the benefit of the doubt and you win (38 CFR § 3.102; 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b)). See the Service Connection Guide for how this test works generally.

Service Connection Pathways: Aggravation, Direct, and Secondary

Flatfoot is not a VA presumptive condition. Service connection must be established through one of the following pathways.

Aggravation (the common path for pre-existing flatfoot)

Flatfoot noted at entry that service permanently worsened. The evidence needs to show the increase in severity was due to service, not just the natural course of the condition. This is the pathway behind nearly every published flatfoot grant, see the entrance-exam trap above for how the burden works.

Direct Service Connection

Flatfoot that developed during service, with a current diagnosis and a link to service, for example the foot strain of prolonged marching, running, and load-bearing where no flatfoot was noted at entry.

Secondary Service Connection (38 CFR § 3.310)

Flatfoot caused or worsened by another service-connected condition that changed your gait or mechanics, or claimed the other way around when the flatfoot itself throws off the knees, hips, or back. Plantar fasciitis granted as secondary to a service-connected ankle disability is a documented example of this pathway working. See our secondary conditions guide.

This only works once the foot is already service-connected. You cannot win a secondary claim, for a hip, knee, ankle, or back condition, built on a flatfoot that is not itself service-connected yet. Those secondary claims fail as a matter of law until the flatfoot is service-connected first. Win the foot before you build on it.

Across published DC 5276 decisions, here is how often the Board granted by the legal theory the claim was argued on:

What VA Looks For: Tests, Records, and Diagnostic Codes

Whether you are arguing aggravation, direct service connection, or a secondary pathway, the record VA actually reviews centers on a small set of documents and data points.

  • Your entrance and separation exams. Whether flatfoot was noted at entry, and what the record shows about its severity by the time you left service. This single comparison decides whether you are arguing aggravation or a direct claim.
  • A current diagnosis: a foot exam confirming pes planus is present now. Without it, the claim does not get off the ground.
  • Service treatment records: documented foot pain, blisters, numbness, arch supports, or shoe inserts issued during service, all of which help show the condition worsened while you were in.
  • The diagnostic codes involved: DC 5276 for the flatfoot itself, plus whatever code applies to a related condition, for example DC 5269 (plantar fasciitis) or the code for a knee, hip, or back disability if you're pursuing a secondary claim off an already-connected foot.
  • The Foot Conditions DBQ: the form the examiner fills out documenting deformity, tenderness, swelling on use, callosities, and whether orthotics relieve your symptoms, discussed in more detail later in this guide.

Evidence That Wins

  • Your entrance and separation exams. For an aggravation claim, these show whether flatfoot was noted at entry and how much it worsened by the time you left. This is the single most important record for pre-existing flatfoot.
  • A current exam documenting the objective signs the rating turns on: deformity, tenderness, swelling on use, callosities, inward bowing, and the weight-bearing line, so the rater can place you above the mild level.
  • Whether orthotics help, and what pain and deformity remain despite them, since relief by arch support caps the rating at mild.
  • Service treatment records showing in-service foot complaints: documented foot pain, blisters, numbness, or issued arch supports and shoe inserts during service help prove the condition actually worsened while you were in, not just that your feet hurt on occasion. Request your full service treatment records early.
  • A private nexus opinion that discusses your specific facts. For aggravation or secondary claims, an opinion that clearly explains why service worsened your flatfoot, and that engages your actual history rather than only general medical literature, can carry the case even when the VA exam gave no opinion at all. See nexus letters.
  • Specific, detailed lay testimony tied to your service. Concrete descriptions of how service worsened your feet, long marches, running in boots, carrying heavy gear, extended time on your feet, carry more weight than a general statement, especially when backed by your records. If your service included combat, say so; VA must accept a credible combat-consistent account of worsening even without a contemporaneous medical note.
  • The Foot Conditions DBQ, which captures the flatfoot findings, one or both feet, and the severity the rating depends on. See the DBQ guide.

Evidence Cited in Published Foot conditions (flatfoot, plantar fasciitis) Decisions

We analyzed 67,795 published Board decisions involving foot conditions (flatfoot, plantar fasciitis) for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 48%, combining every diagnostic code below. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.

Plantar fasciitis diagnosis documentedfavorable 62.3%
n = 18,020
Arch supports, orthotics, or inserts documentedfavorable 65.9%
n = 14,031
Marked pronation or plantar tenderness findingsfavorable 66%
n = 11,250
Entrance-exam baseline discussed (preexisting vs acquired)favorable 59.2%
n = 10,235
Weight-bearing X-ray or imaging of the feetfavorable 56.2%
n = 8,697
Foot surgery documentedfavorable 57.6%
n = 4,517

By diagnostic code

These codes are grouped together above. They do not perform the same, so find your own code here rather than reading the combined figure. Codes retired in the schedule rewrites are left out, because their old decisions were judged under criteria that no longer apply.

DC 5284 Foot injuries, otherfavorable 35%
n = 34,634 decisions · 1,286 granted
DC 5276 Flatfoot, acquiredfavorable 59.5%
n = 19,512 decisions · 1,525 granted
DC 5269 Plantar fasciitisfavorable 66.8%
n = 12,751 decisions · 1,109 granted
DC 5280 Hallux valgus, unilateralfavorable 63.8%
n = 6,722 decisions · 457 granted

Detected by phrase-reading the decision text with condition-specific vocabularies. Source: Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, RateMyVSO analysis.

Board Grants, Dissected

The Board has granted direct service connection for acquired flatfoot (pes planus) in a number of recent decisions. Most of these claims turn on whether flatfoot that was noted when the veteran entered service got worse during service, or whether flatfoot that was not noted at entry can be tied to duties like marching, running, or standing for long hours. Board decisions are not binding on other cases, but the reasoning below shows what has persuaded the Board in this condition.

Silent-exam pes planus claim wins on the aggravation presumption Citation A26037972 (April 22, 2026), direct review docket

The record: The veteran's entrance exam noted mild, asymptomatic bilateral pes planus. His October 2001 discharge exam documented a diagnosis of pes planus and a prescription for arch supports. He reported that his foot pain increased during service because of marches and carrying heavy equipment. VA examiners had reviewed the file but did not adequately address whether the increase in disability was due to natural progression.

Why it won: The Board found that once a preexisting condition is noted at entry, the veteran only needs to show an increase in disability during service to trigger the presumption of aggravation. The burden then shifts to VA to show by clear and unmistakable evidence that any increase was natural progression. Because no VA opinion adequately explained why the progression was natural, the Board found the presumption of aggravation not rebutted and granted the claim.

Corn removal surgery leads to pes planus grant despite a decades-old denial Citation A26037947 (April 22, 2026), direct review docket

The record: A prior 2009 rating decision had denied a related claim, but new lay statements about ongoing foot symptoms were found new and relevant, allowing readjudication. Service treatment records documented a right fifth toe corn removal with a percutaneous alignment procedure. A 2011 VA exam diagnosed congenital pes planus.

Why it won: The Board found clear and unmistakable evidence the pes planus was congenital and preexisting, but found it was not clear and unmistakable that it was not aggravated by the in-service foot surgery. The Board relied on documented right foot surgery and continuing chronic foot pain to find the aggravation standard unmet by VA, granting service connection for pes planus along with bilateral foot pain and corn removal residuals.

Missing service records do not defeat the claim when hearing testimony fills the gap Citation A26037648 (April 22, 2026), direct review docket

The record: The veteran's service treatment records from part of his enlistment could not be located. His entrance exam had noted mild, asymptomatic pes planus. He testified at a Board hearing that his symptoms worsened due to marching in boots and that he went to sick call for pain during service.

Why it won: The Board found the veteran competent and credible to describe his in-service foot pain, especially given his job duties. Because service records were unavailable, the Board noted VA's heightened duty to assist. The Board found the change from asymptomatic to symptomatic pes planus showed a worsening in service, and that VA had not met its burden to show by clear and unmistakable evidence that the worsening was due to natural progression.

Chiropractor's foot scan outweighs the absence of a contrary VA opinion Citation A26037521 (April 22, 2026), hearing docket

The record: The veteran's entrance exam noted asymptomatic pes planus. He testified that his symptoms worsened in service but that he avoided sick call out of fear of punishment. A private chiropractor reviewed a 3D digital foot scan and confirmed the pes planus was aggravated in service. No VA medical opinion addressed the claim at all.

Why it won: With no medical opinion of record contradicting the chiropractor's finding, the Board found the presumption of aggravation attached and was not rebutted. The Board specifically noted there was no medical opinion to the contrary.

Private nurse practitioner's opinion fills a nexus gap the STRs could not Citation A26037104 (April 21, 2026), hearing docket

The record: Service treatment records showed normal feet at entrance and separation, with no documented diagnosis of pes planus during service. The veteran, a general vehicle repairman, testified that his duties required marching in boots and lifting heavy transmissions. A private Family Medicine Nurse Practitioner examined him, reviewed his file, and attributed his bilateral pes planus to these in-service duties.

Why it won: The Board found the veteran's account of his duties and in-service foot pain credible and consistent with the circumstances of his service, even without contemporaneous treatment records. See Buchanan v. Nicholson. The Board gave the private examiner's opinion some probative weight because it was well-supported and consistent with the record, and found the overall evidence in approximate balance, granting the claim.

Why These Claims Get Denied

Beyond the general "no diagnosis" and "no nexus" reasons covered above, a few specific denial patterns show up often enough in published flatfoot decisions to call out on their own.

  • Foot pain in service, without the underlying condition actually worsening. This is the most common way an aggravation claim fails. Pain or flare-ups during service are not enough on their own; the flatfoot itself has to have gotten worse. Being symptom-free at entry and then having symptoms in service does not, by itself, count as aggravation.
  • No current diagnosis. A VA foot exam that finds no pes planus ends the claim regardless of anything else in the file, even where the veteran believed they had flat feet.
  • A secondary claim built on a foot condition that is not yet service-connected. Hip, knee, ankle, or back claims argued as secondary to flatfoot fail as a matter of law until the flatfoot itself is service-connected. Win the foot first.
  • A conclusory statement with no reasoning behind it. Writing only that your flat feet are "from service," with nothing more, does not carry the claim and may not even be enough to trigger a VA exam.
  • Reopening with the wrong form after a final denial. Using a general application instead of a Supplemental Claim to reopen a previously denied flatfoot claim can cost you an earlier effective date, even when the claim eventually gets granted.
4,272 classified flatfoot service-connection denials split by the missing element, with the three required direct-claim elements.
Visual guide: Flatfoot Direct-Claim Denials View full size · All 44 visual guides
Mild, moderate, severe, and pronounced unilateral and bilateral criteria.
Visual guide: Acquired Flatfoot Rating Guide View full size · All 44 visual guides

How the VA Rates Flatfoot (DC 5276)

The level is set by how severe the deformity and symptoms are, and whether one or both feet are affected. The higher percentages require objective signs, not just pain.

SeverityBoth feetOne foot
Pronounced: marked deformity, extreme tenderness, not improved by orthotics50%30%
Severe: marked deformity, pain on use, swelling, callosities30%20%
Moderate: weight-bearing line over the great toe, inward bowing, pain on use10%10%
Mild: symptoms relieved by an arch support or built-up shoe0%0%
Orthotics are part of the test. If arch supports relieve your symptoms, the flatfoot is rated mild (0%). The compensable levels describe feet that stay symptomatic despite treatment, so the record should show whether orthotics helped and what remains.
50% is the schedular ceiling. The maximum schedular rating for bilateral flatfoot is 50 percent under DC 5276. Once you have 50 percent, VA cannot rate the flatfoot itself any higher on this schedule, though a distinct condition it caused, like plantar fasciitis, can carry its own separate rating (see below).
A separate condition can get its own rating, but VA won't pay twice for the same symptom. Plantar fasciitis can be rated on its own under a different diagnostic code (DC 5269) if its symptoms are genuinely distinct from the flatfoot. This does not stack with a rating for the same underlying symptom already compensated under DC 5276, a rule called pyramiding (38 CFR § 4.14).
Rating reductions have to be justified, not assumed. VA cannot cut your rating just because a new exam looks a bit better. It has to show your actual ability to function improved, following the procedures in 38 CFR § 3.344 and 38 CFR § 3.105. An improper reduction can be challenged and the prior rating restored.

Common Mistakes

The same handful of missteps account for most lost or under-rated flatfoot claims. Among the Board's classified service-connection denials for flatfoot, here is what claims most often fell short on:

  • Ignoring the entrance exam. If flatfoot was noted at entry and you argue it started in service, the claim fails on the facts. Argue aggravation instead, and show the worsening.
  • Expecting a compensable rating on pain alone. The 10 percent and higher levels require objective deformity and signs. Make sure the exam records tenderness, swelling on use, callosities, and the weight-bearing line, not just that your feet hurt.
  • Not addressing orthotics. If arch supports relieve the symptoms, the rating stays at mild. The record should show what pain and deformity remain despite treatment.
  • Treating two flat feet as two claims. Bilateral flatfoot is one rating at the higher bilateral level, not two separate ratings. Frame it as a single bilateral condition.
  • Skipping the aggravation nexus. For pre-existing flatfoot, a missing opinion on whether service worsened it beyond natural progression is a leading denial reason.
  • Using the wrong form to reopen a prior denial. After a final denial, reopen with a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995), not a general application (VA Form 21-526EZ). The wrong form can cost you an earlier effective date.

Do's and Don'ts

A condensed version of everything above, in the order it actually matters when you sit down to build your file.

Do
  • Argue aggravation, not causation, if flatfoot was noted at your entrance exam.
  • Get a current medical diagnosis of flatfoot in writing before you file.
  • Check your entrance and separation exams for whether flatfoot was noted, and how it changed.
  • Gather service records showing foot pain, blisters, numbness, or issued inserts during service.
  • Get a private nexus opinion that explains its reasoning and discusses your specific facts, not just general studies.
  • Write a detailed statement on how service duties worsened your feet, marches, boots, gear, time on your feet, and note any combat service.
  • Document whether orthotics help, and what pain or deformity remains despite them.
  • To reopen an old denial, file a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) with new and relevant evidence.
Don't
  • Don't assume foot pain during service by itself proves aggravation, the underlying condition has to have actually worsened.
  • Don't file without a current diagnosis in the record.
  • Don't build a secondary claim (hip, knee, ankle, back) on a flatfoot that isn't service-connected yet.
  • Don't rely on a conclusory statement like "my flat feet are from service" with nothing more behind it.
  • Don't use a general application to reopen a final denial, use a Supplemental Claim instead or risk losing your effective date.
  • Don't ignore your entrance exam if it lists flatfoot, build around aggravation instead.
  • Don't expect a compensable rating without documented objective deformity, tenderness may not be enough on its own.
  • Don't treat bilateral flatfoot as two separate claims.

What Flatfoot Is

Flatfoot means the arch of the foot has dropped so that most or all of the sole touches the ground. It can cause foot pain, arch and heel pain, swelling, and an inward roll of the ankle that throws off the whole leg. The VA rates acquired flatfoot, the kind that develops or worsens over time, under diagnostic code 5276, part of the musculoskeletal schedule (see 38 CFR § 4.71a).

Flatfoot is rated differently from most paired conditions. When both feet are affected, the VA does not give two separate ratings plus the bilateral factor. Bilateral flatfoot is a single rating at the higher "bilateral" level built into DC 5276.
Entry notation, in-service worsening, natural progression, and current disability.
Visual guide: Preexisting Flatfoot and Aggravation View full size · All 44 visual guides

The Entrance-Exam Trap (Soundness and Aggravation)

If flatfoot was noted when you entered service, you are not claiming a new condition, you are claiming that service made it worse. A condition recorded on your entrance exam is not covered by the presumption of soundness under 38 U.S.C. § 1111, so to win you generally have to show aggravation: that service permanently worsened the flatfoot beyond its natural progression under 38 U.S.C. § 1153 and 38 CFR § 3.306. A mild arch that became a painful, deformed foot after years of marching and boots is the classic aggravation case. This is not a minor technicality: across a recent sample of published Board decisions on flatfoot, every single grant of service connection went through this aggravation theory, none succeeded on a claim that service simply caused the condition from scratch.

If flatfoot was not noted at entry, the presumption of soundness applies, and you are on the ordinary direct or secondary path instead. Which situation you are in changes the whole claim, so the first thing to check is what your entrance exam actually recorded. See presumption of soundness and aggravation.

Once you show real worsening, the burden shifts to VA. After you show a genuine increase in the underlying condition during service, VA has to prove by clear and unmistakable evidence that the worsening was only natural aging, not service. If VA cannot meet that standard, you win.
Combat veterans get an extra boost. If your worsening is consistent with the conditions of combat, VA must accept your lay account of it (38 U.S.C. § 1154(b)). A detailed, credible account of foot pain from marching and combat duty, consistent with your service record, can carry real weight even without a contemporaneous medical note.

Quick Checklist Before You File

Bring these together before you submit anything.

  • A current medical diagnosis of flatfoot (pes planus) in writing.
  • Your entrance exam, and a note of whether flatfoot was listed there.
  • If it was listed, build your case around aggravation (worsening in service), not causation.
  • Service records showing foot pain, issued inserts, or treatment during service.
  • A private nexus opinion that discusses your specific facts and explains its reasoning.
  • A detailed personal statement on how service duties worsened your feet, noting any combat service.
  • If you were denied before: a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) with new and relevant evidence, not just a repeat of what was already considered.

For the mechanics of actually submitting the claim, see the Standard Claim Guide and the Fully Developed Claim Guide (filing with all your evidence up front can speed up the decision).

The Claims Process, Step by Step

Once you file, your claim moves through a series of hand-offs. Understanding who does what helps you know who to contact, and what to expect, at each stage.

  1. You file the claim. Directly with VA, through VA.gov, or with the help of an accredited representative.
  2. VA acknowledges the claim and assigns it for development. A Veteran Service Representative (VSR) is assigned to gather your service treatment records, VA and private medical records, and any other evidence needed.
  3. The VSR orders a Compensation & Pension (C&P) exam if one is needed. Most flatfoot claims do, especially aggravation claims where the exam has to compare current severity against what your entrance exam recorded.
  4. The C&P exam is conducted. By a VA clinician or a contracted examiner, who completes the Foot Conditions DBQ documenting the diagnosis, severity, whether orthotics help, and, where relevant, a nexus opinion.
  5. The file goes to a Rating Veteran Service Representative (RVSR), the "rater." The rater reviews the complete file, including the exam results, and decides whether service connection is warranted and at what percentage.
  6. A senior reviewer may review the decision before it's finalized, depending on the complexity of the claim.
  7. VA issues the decision letter. This states whether the claim is granted or denied, the rating percentage if granted, and the reasons behind the decision.
  8. If you disagree, you choose an appeal lane. Higher-Level Review, Supplemental Claim, or a Board appeal, covered later in this guide.

Who's who: VSO vs. VSR vs. Rater vs. C&P Examiner

Your VSO

An accredited representative from a veterans service organization, or an accredited attorney or claims agent. Not a VA employee. Helps you prepare, gather evidence, and file, and can represent you through an appeal. Has no authority to decide your claim.

VSR (Veteran Service Representative)

VA staff who "develops" your claim: requests records, schedules the C&P exam, and assembles the file. Does not decide the rating.

Rater (RVSR)

VA staff who reviews the completed file and makes the actual decision, service connection or denial, and the percentage. This is the person whose judgment the decision letter reflects.

C&P Examiner

A VA clinician or a contracted medical examiner who conducts the exam and completes the DBQ. Documents findings and, where asked, a nexus opinion. Does not decide the claim.

For the full walkthrough of every stage with more detail, see Inside Your Claim and Claim Stages.

DBQs and Your C&P Exam

A Disability Benefits Questionnaire (DBQ) is the standardized form an examiner completes for your condition, it structures the exam findings into the specific data points VA's rating schedule requires (for flatfoot, that includes deformity, tenderness, swelling on use, callosities, the weight-bearing line, and whether orthotics relieve symptoms). See the DBQ Guide for how these forms work, including whether a private DBQ completed by your own doctor can be submitted instead of relying solely on a VA exam.

Before your C&P exam, bring a clear, specific account of your symptoms, focus on your worst days and how the condition affects daily function, not just how you feel on an average day. Note whether you wear orthotics and what symptoms persist despite them. Be consistent with what's already in your medical records and prior statements. For a full walkthrough of what to expect and how to prepare, see the C&P Exam Prep Guide.

Reading Your Decision Letter, and What to Do If Denied

Your decision letter has two parts: a narrative section explaining the reasoning (often called "reasons and bases"), and a codesheet showing the actual rating percentage, the effective date, and the diagnostic code used. See the Reading Your Decision Letter Guide for how to find and interpret each part, or use the Letter Interpreter tool to upload your own letter and get a plain-English breakdown.

If your claim is denied, or the rating is lower than you expected, you have three main lanes:

  • Supplemental Claim: refile with new and relevant evidence, such as a new nexus opinion, updated exam findings, or newly located service treatment records. This is also the correct lane to reopen a flatfoot claim after a prior final denial, not a general application. See Supplemental Claim Guide.
  • Higher-Level Review (HLR): a senior reviewer looks at the same evidence again for a difference of opinion, no new evidence is added. See HLR Guide.
  • Board Appeal: your case goes to a Veterans Law Judge at the Board of Veterans' Appeals, with options for a direct review, an evidence docket, or a hearing. See Board Appeal Guide.

Not sure which lane fits your situation? See the Appeals decision guide for a side-by-side comparison of all three.

After You Win: Rating, Effective Date, and Maintaining It

A grant is not always the end of the story. Many veterans who already have flatfoot service-connected end up back at the Board fighting over the rating percentage, the effective date, or a rating reduction rather than service connection itself. A few rules matter here:

  • 50% is the ceiling. The maximum schedular rating for bilateral flatfoot is 50 percent under DC 5276. Once you're there, the flatfoot itself cannot be rated higher on the schedule, though a distinct condition it caused, like plantar fasciitis under DC 5269, can carry its own separate rating as long as the symptoms are genuinely distinct and not the same ones already compensated (avoiding pyramiding under 38 CFR § 4.14).
  • Reductions have to be justified. VA cannot cut your rating just because a new exam looks a little better; it has to show your actual ability to function improved, following 38 CFR § 3.344. Improper reductions can be challenged and the prior rating restored.
  • Effective dates on reopened claims usually run from the reopening filing date. After a prior final denial, your effective date usually cannot be earlier than the date you filed the claim to reopen. Old service records can sometimes move it earlier, but only if they are actually relevant to why you were denied.

Keep your treatment consistent, continued follow-up and records showing whether orthotics still help, protects you if VA schedules a future reexamination. Not every rating gets reexamined; understand when a rating becomes protected from future review (including Permanent and Total status) and what to do if VA proposes to reduce it. See Protect Your Rating and Future Reexaminations for the specifics.

If your flatfoot worsens after the initial grant, you can file for an increased rating. See the Rating Increase Guide.

Common Secondary Conditions

Flatfoot changes how force travels up the leg, so it sits at the start of a chain, and it can also be the downstream result of another condition. Each bar below is the Board's grant rate for DC 5276 in that pairing, with the number of decisions under it. They describe the published record across many veterans, not a prediction about any one claim.

Conditions that can cause flatfoot (flatfoot as the secondary)

Claims where flatfoot was argued as secondary to an already service-connected condition, one way this guide's "ways to connect via another condition" list applies:

Conditions flatfoot can cause (flatfoot as the primary)

Conditions veterans have claimed as caused or aggravated by service-connected flatfoot, as the fallen arch and altered gait strain the rest of the chain, once the flatfoot itself is already service-connected:

Two-direction secondary-claim snapshot for FLATFOOT, showing BVA grant rates and appeal counts for conditions claimed toward and away from FLATFOOT.
Visual guide: Flatfoot Secondary-Claim Snapshot View full size · Explore the full network · All 44 visual guides
The foot-up-the-leg chain: flatfoot commonly drives claims for plantar fasciitis, the ankle, the knee, the hip, and the low back on the same side. If the flatfoot is service-connected and one of these develops, it may be claimable as secondary with a medical link back to the feet. Remember the reverse does not work: a hip, knee, ankle, or back claim cannot ride on a flatfoot that is not itself service-connected yet.

Quick Reference Tables

Service Connection Pathways

Pathway What It Requires Evidence Needed
AggravationFlatfoot noted at entry, permanently worsened beyond natural progression by serviceEntrance/separation exams + STRs showing in-service foot complaints + nexus opinion on worsening
DirectFlatfoot not noted at entry, arose during serviceCurrent diagnosis + STRs + nexus opinion linking onset to service
SecondaryFlatfoot caused/worsened by an already service-connected condition, or the reverse once flatfoot is service-connected (DC 5276)Diagnosis of both conditions + nexus opinion on the causal link

From Filing to Decision: Who Does What

Role Does Decides your rating?
VSO / accredited representativeHelps prepare, gather evidence, and file; represents you on appealNo
VSRDevelops the claim: orders records and the C&P examNo
C&P ExaminerConducts the exam, completes the Foot Conditions DBQ, may give a nexus opinionNo / but has a strong impact
Rater (RVSR)Reviews the full file and decides service connection and percentageYes

Frequently Asked Questions

My flatfoot was noted when I joined. Can I still get compensation?
Yes, through aggravation. A condition noted at entry is not covered by the presumption of soundness, so you show that service permanently worsened the flatfoot beyond its natural progression. Your entrance and separation exams are the key evidence.
Why is my flatfoot rated 0 percent?
If arch supports or a built-up shoe relieve your symptoms, DC 5276 rates the flatfoot mild, which is 0 percent. Compensable levels require objective deformity and symptoms that persist despite treatment. If your feet stay painful and deformed with orthotics, that should be documented.
Do I get two ratings for two flat feet?
No. Flatfoot is unusual: bilateral pes planus is a single rating at the higher "both feet" level built into DC 5276, not two separate ratings with the bilateral factor added.
What is the highest flatfoot rating?
Pronounced bilateral flatfoot, marked deformity and extreme tenderness that is not improved by orthotics, is rated 50 percent. Pronounced in one foot is 30 percent. Once you're at 50 percent bilateral, DC 5276 itself cannot go higher, though a distinct condition like plantar fasciitis may carry its own separate rating.
Can flatfoot cause my knee or back problems?
It can. A fallen arch changes how force travels up the leg and can contribute to plantar fasciitis, ankle, knee, hip, and low-back conditions. If the flatfoot is service-connected, those may be claimable as secondary with a medical link. The reverse does not work: those conditions cannot be claimed as secondary to a flatfoot that isn't service-connected yet.
My flatfoot claim was denied before. Can I try again?
Yes, by filing a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) with new and relevant evidence, such as a new nexus opinion, updated exam findings, or newly located service treatment records. Using the wrong form to reopen can cost you an earlier effective date, so use the Supplemental Claim process specifically.

Related Tools and Guides

Knee, Back and Foot Visual Guide Library
All 36 printable charts: instability, motion, IVDS, flatfoot, and Board research.
DC 5276, flatfoot
The code page with rating levels and BVA data.
Service Connection Guide
The three-element test that underlies every VA disability claim.
Presumption of Soundness
Why a condition noted at entry changes the claim.
Aggravation
Proving service permanently worsened a pre-existing condition.
Joint Motion Guide
Plantar fasciitis, ankle, and the joints flatfoot strains.
Nexus Letters
The medical link an aggravation or secondary claim turns on.
Secondary Conditions
Connecting the knee, hip, or back back to your feet.
Buddy & Lay Statements
How to document foot pain and functional impact others witnessed.
DBQ Guide
The standardized exam form behind every C&P exam.
C&P Exam Prep
What to expect at the exam, including the orthotics question.
Inside Your Claim
Who handles your claim at each stage, from VSR to rater.
Claim Stages
The full walkthrough of every stage in the claims process.
Reading Your Decision Letter
How to find the rating, the effective date, and the reasoning in your letter.
Letter Interpreter Tool
Upload your decision letter for a plain-English breakdown.
Appeals Guide
Supplemental Claim vs Higher-Level Review vs Board appeal, side by side.
Supplemental Claim Guide
The right lane to reopen a flatfoot claim after a final denial.
HLR Guide
A senior reviewer takes a fresh look at the same evidence.
Protect Your Rating
Permanent and Total status, reexaminations, and reduction defense.
Future Reexaminations
When VA can schedule a future exam and what to expect.

Sources

  1. 38 CFR § 4.71a, Diagnostic Code 5276 (rating of flatfoot) and Diagnostic Code 5269 (rating of plantar fasciitis)
  2. 38 CFR § 3.303, basic rules for service connection
  3. 38 CFR § 3.304(b), presumption of soundness at entry
  4. 38 CFR § 3.306, aggravation of a pre-existing condition
  5. 38 CFR § 3.310, Secondary Service Connection
  6. 38 CFR § 3.102, benefit of the doubt
  7. 38 U.S.C. § 1153, aggravation in service
  8. 38 U.S.C. § 1111, presumption of sound condition
  9. 38 U.S.C. § 1154(b), combat veterans and lay evidence
  10. 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b), benefit of the doubt
  11. 38 CFR § 4.14, avoiding pyramiding
  12. 38 CFR § 3.344, rating reductions
  13. 38 CFR § 3.105, rating reduction and severance procedures
  14. 38 CFR § 3.156, new and material or new and relevant evidence; 38 CFR § 3.2501, supplemental claims
  15. 38 CFR § 3.400 and 38 U.S.C. § 5110, effective dates
  16. 38 CFR § 20.1303, non-precedential effect of individual Board decisions
  17. CCK Law, "Flat Feet (Pes Planus) VA Disability Ratings"
  18. Hill & Ponton, "VA Disability for Flat Feet"