Digestive Conditions Rating Guide

Stomach, bowel, and liver conditions are among the most common VA disability claims, and almost all of them are rated under the same schedule: 38 CFR § 4.114. Most turn on how severe your symptoms are, and one rule about overlapping conditions decides more of them than any other. Learn that pattern once and you understand your whole claim. This guide explains the rules that decide every digestive rating, then points you to the detailed guide for your specific condition.

The Rules That Decide Every Digestive Claim

Most digestive codes are rated on symptom severity, not on a single test number. The examiner and the rater look at your overall picture, a mild, moderate, or severe pattern, and match it to the criteria for your condition. A string of shared rules sits on top of that, and one of them decides more abdominal claims than anything else.

1. Most digestive conditions are rated by symptom severity

Stomach and bowel codes are generally scored as a mild, moderate, or severe symptom picture, how often attacks happen, how bad the pain is, and whether there is vomiting or diarrhea, rather than by a single lab value. The worse and more frequent the symptoms, the higher the rating. Because the words matter, a treatment record that documents the pattern is worth more than one that only lists a diagnosis.

2. Weight loss, anemia, and malnutrition raise the rating

Sustained weight loss and lab-confirmed anemia are signs of a more severe condition, and they push several digestive codes into a higher bracket. Malnutrition works the same way. If these are happening and the file does not show them, the rating can come back lower than the condition actually warrants.

3. The coexisting-conditions rule is the signature of this schedule

This is the rule that decides the most digestive claims. Under 38 CFR § 4.113 and § 4.114, abdominal conditions that produce overlapping symptoms, for example GERD, an ulcer, a hiatal hernia, IBS, and gastritis, generally are not rated separately and combined. Instead, a single evaluation is assigned under the diagnostic code that reflects the predominant disability. The point is to avoid rating the same stomach pain several times over. Knowing this in advance changes how you frame a claim: you are usually arguing about which one code best captures the whole picture, not stacking five of them.

4. A few conditions are rated on their own terms

Not everything in the abdomen follows the coexisting-conditions rule. Liver disease, such as hepatitis C, is rated on its own specific findings rather than folded into a single abdominal evaluation. Hemorrhoids and hernias also have their own scales and are handled separately. So a hernia or hemorrhoids can often be claimed alongside a stomach condition that is already rated.

"Predominant" is the word to know. When several overlapping abdominal conditions are present, the rater assigns one code, the one for the disability that is doing the most damage to your function. If you disagree with which code was chosen, that is often the real question on appeal, not whether you should have gotten five separate ratings. Open your specific condition's condition lookup page to see how each code is scored.

Find the Guide for Your Condition

The rules above apply across the board. For the exact rating levels, the C&P exam, and the Board data for your specific condition, open the dedicated guide:

AreaGuideDC codes
GERDGERD Claims Guide7206
Peptic ulcerPeptic Ulcer Guide7304
IBS and IBDIBS and IBD Guide7319
Ulcerative colitisUlcerative Colitis Guide7323
Crohn's diseaseCrohn's Disease Guide7326
HemorrhoidsHemorrhoids Guide7336
HerniaHernia Guide7338
Hepatitis CHepatitis C Guide7354
Celiac diseaseCeliac Disease Guide7355

For any code not listed, open its condition lookup page for the rating levels and Board data.

Every Digestive Diagnostic Code, With Board Outcomes

Every diagnostic code in this body system, ordered by how often it reaches the Board of Veterans' Appeals. Percentages are the share of each code's Board issues granted, denied, or remanded (sent back for more development); dismissed and other outcomes are not shown, so rows do not sum to 100%. Each code links to its full page: rating criteria, evidence notes, and secondary-condition data.

DCConditionBoard appealsGrantedDeniedRemanded
7206Gastroesophageal reflux disease34,55520.3%29.8%43.4%
7319Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)18,95721.5%26.7%44.4%
7338Hernia, including femoral, inguinal, umbilical, ventral, incisional, and other (but not including hiatal)14,22612.6%43%38.5%
7354Hepatitis C (or non-A, non-B hepatitis)14,18414.9%39.5%39.9%
7336Hemorrhoids, external or internal13,63714.1%45.5%34.1%
7304Peptic ulcer disease11,95214%43.9%37%
7345Chronic liver disease without cirrhosis9,7569.6%41.5%43.5%
7346Hiatal hernia and paraesophageal hernia8,15216.7%39.7%38.5%
7343Malignant neoplasms of the digestive system, exclusive of skin growths7,91818.4%31.2%42.8%
7323Colitis, ulcerative2,72716.5%29.6%49.8%
7307Gastritis, chronic2,13910.8%24.9%60.6%
7332Rectum and anus, impairment of sphincter control1,84525.7%28.7%39.9%
7329Intestine, large, resection of1,69717.1%34.2%43.4%
7327Diverticulitis and diverticulosis1,61412.7%21.6%61.2%
7326Crohn's disease or undifferentiated form of inflammatory bowel disease1,34824.2%20.2%51.7%
7301Peritoneum, adhesions of, due to surgery, trauma, disease, or infection1,23117.4%36.6%42.2%
7344Benign neoplasms, exclusive of skin growths1,2226.5%38.6%47.9%
7203Esophagus, stricture of1,11920.9%34%38.9%
7312Cirrhosis of the liver1,00617%27.7%49%
7315Cholelithiasis, chronic9678.8%28.6%55.6%
7347Pancreatitis, chronic9389.3%31.9%56.2%
7318Cholecystectomy (gallbladder removal), complications of (such as strictures and biliary leaks)87219%50%25.6%
7311Residuals of injury of the liver7779.7%50.6%31.5%
7335Ano, fistula in, including anorectal fistula and anorectal abscess62219.8%32.5%44.9%
7200Soft tissue injury of the mouth, other than tongue or lips6039.8%44.4%41.3%
7207Barrett's esophagus49712.1%24.5%58.4%
7351Liver transplant40820.1%34.3%39.5%
7356Gastrointestinal dysmotility syndrome37323.6%24.9%43.4%
7308Postgastrectomy syndrome35218.2%27%51.4%
7204Esophageal motility disorder32211.5%22.7%61.8%
7355Celiac disease25517.3%29%47.8%
7328Intestine, small, resection of23419.2%36.3%41.9%
7348Vagotomy with pyloroplasty or gastroenterostomy6820.6%36.8%42.6%
7330Intestinal fistulous disease, external5022%38%40%
Show 17 more codes with too few Board appeals to report (expand)
DCConditionBoard appealsGrantedDeniedRemanded
7201Lips, injuries ofToo few Board appeals to report
7202Tongue, loss of whole or partToo few Board appeals to report
7205Esophagus, diverticulum of, acquiredToo few Board appeals to report
7303Chronic complications of upper gastrointestinal surgeryToo few Board appeals to report
7309Stomach, stenosis ofToo few Board appeals to report
7310Stomach, injury of, residualsToo few Board appeals to report
7314Chronic biliary tract diseaseToo few Board appeals to report
7317Gallbladder, injury ofToo few Board appeals to report
7325Enteritis, chronicToo few Board appeals to report
7331Peritonitis, tuberculous, active or inactiveToo few Board appeals to report
7333Rectum and anus, stricture ofToo few Board appeals to report
7334Rectum, prolapse ofToo few Board appeals to report
7337Pruritus ani (anal itching)Too few Board appeals to report
7342Visceroptosis, symptomatic, markedToo few Board appeals to report
7350Liver abscessToo few Board appeals to report
7352Pancreas transplantToo few Board appeals to report
7357Post pancreatectomy syndromeToo few Board appeals to report

Counts from RateMyVSO's index of published BVA decisions, refreshed weekly. A remand is not a loss; it means the Board needed more evidence before deciding. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction for any claim.

Common Secondary Conditions

Digestive problems rarely arrive alone. Because the gut reacts to medication and to stress, one service-connected condition often opens the door to several secondary claims:

  • GERD or gastritis from pain medication. Long-term NSAID use for a service-connected condition, a bad back or knee, for example, can irritate the stomach and cause GERD or gastritis as a secondary condition.
  • Conditions from a medication regimen. More broadly, a digestive condition can be claimed as secondary to the service-connected medications you have to take for something else.
  • Weight loss and malnutrition. A chronic GI condition that keeps you from absorbing or keeping down food can drive weight loss and malnutrition, which are themselves part of the disability picture.
  • Depression or anxiety. A chronic, unpredictable, and often embarrassing digestive condition can drive depression and anxiety, which can be claimed as secondary to the physical condition. See secondary conditions.

Each dedicated guide above shows the live Board grant rates for that condition's most common pairings.

Evidence That Wins

  • Endoscopy, colonoscopy, or imaging confirming the condition, the objective backbone that shows the diagnosis is real and how far it has progressed.
  • A weight record showing sustained loss, dated over time, because weight loss is one of the findings that moves several digestive codes into a higher bracket.
  • Lab work showing anemia, which, like weight loss, is a marker of a more severe condition and can raise the rating.
  • Treatment records showing the pattern and medications, how often symptoms flare, how severe they get, and what you are prescribed. The pattern is what most digestive codes are rated on.
  • The matching DBQ for the condition, which prompts the examiner to capture the severity and frequency the rating depends on. See the DBQ guide.

Evidence Cited in Published GERD Decisions

We analyzed 30,956 published Board decisions involving gerd for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 63.5%, combining every diagnostic code below. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.

Pyrosis with regurgitation findingsfavorable 73%
n = 8,605
Acid-suppression medication documentedfavorable 70%
n = 6,592
Endoscopy or upper-GI imaging performedfavorable 65.9%
n = 5,124

By diagnostic code

These codes are grouped together above. They do not perform the same, so find your own code here rather than reading the combined figure. Codes retired in the schedule rewrites are left out, because their old decisions were judged under criteria that no longer apply.

DC 7206 Gastroesophageal reflux diseasefavorable 63.9%
n = 25,669 decisions · 2,278 granted
DC 7346 Hiatal hernia and paraesophageal herniafavorable 62.8%
n = 6,910 decisions · 539 granted

Evidence Cited in Published Peptic ulcer disease Decisions

We analyzed 7,736 published Board decisions involving peptic ulcer disease for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 51.8%. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.

GI bleeding, melena, or hematemesis documentedfavorable 54.7%
n = 2,285
Endoscopy or upper-GI imaging confirmationfavorable 54.6%
n = 2,173
Anemia or weight loss tied to ulcer diseasefavorable 50.9%
n = 951
H. pylori testing documentedfavorable 56.1%
n = 569
NSAID etiology discussed (medication-caused ulcer)favorable 61.9%
n = 202

Evidence Cited in Published IBS Decisions

We analyzed 20,472 published Board decisions involving ibs for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 60.1%. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.

Alternating diarrhea and constipation documentedfavorable 77.9%
n = 3,638
Gulf War functional-GI presumption addressedfavorable 79.4%
n = 3,435
GI workup performed (colonoscopy, stool studies)favorable 65.8%
n = 2,033
Abdominal distress findingsfavorable 80.1%
n = 1,244

Evidence Cited in Published Ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s (IBD) Decisions

We analyzed 4,669 published Board decisions involving ulcerative colitis and crohn’s (ibd) for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 41%, combining every diagnostic code below. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.

Colonoscopy or biopsy in the recordfavorable 53.8%
n = 1,165
Anemia or malnutrition findingsfavorable 55.6%
n = 901
Bowel resection or ostomy documentedfavorable 54.5%
n = 543
IBD medications or biologics documentedfavorable 67.7%
n = 294
Exacerbation frequency documentedfavorable 60.4%
n = 96

By diagnostic code

These codes are grouped together above. They do not perform the same, so find your own code here rather than reading the combined figure. Codes retired in the schedule rewrites are left out, because their old decisions were judged under criteria that no longer apply.

DC 7323 Colitis, ulcerativefavorable 43.5%
n = 3,528 decisions · 339 granted
DC 7326 Crohn's disease or undifferentiated form of inflammatory bowel diseasefavorable 38.9%
n = 1,425 decisions · 168 granted

Detected by phrase-reading the decision text with condition-specific vocabularies. Source: Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, RateMyVSO analysis.

Symptoms Recorded in Granted GERD Decisions

We analyzed 2,673 granted Board decisions involving gerd for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.

Heartburn (pyrosis)share of granted 50.9%
n = 1,360
Regurgitationshare of granted 41.9%
n = 1,121
Substernal or chest painshare of granted 37.7%
n = 1,009
Difficulty swallowing (dysphagia)share of granted 34.9%
n = 934
Nauseashare of granted 30.5%
n = 815
Vomitingshare of granted 28.2%
n = 755

Symptoms Recorded in Granted Peptic ulcer disease Decisions

We analyzed 470 granted Board decisions involving peptic ulcer disease for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.

Vomitingshare of granted 27.4%
n = 129
Nauseashare of granted 17%
n = 80
Epigastric painshare of granted 14.7%
n = 69
Heartburnshare of granted 6.4%
n = 30

Symptoms Recorded in Granted IBS Decisions

We analyzed 1,457 granted Board decisions involving ibs for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.

Diarrheashare of granted 41.5%
n = 604
Abdominal pain or distressshare of granted 34.2%
n = 499
Constipationshare of granted 28.7%
n = 418
Alternating diarrhea and constipationshare of granted 17.8%
n = 260
Bloatingshare of granted 10.1%
n = 147
Crampingshare of granted 7.8%
n = 114

Detected by phrase-reading the decision text with condition-specific vocabularies. Source: Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, RateMyVSO analysis.

Common Mistakes

  • Expecting to stack several overlapping stomach conditions. The coexisting-conditions rule collapses GERD, an ulcer, a hiatal hernia, and gastritis into a single rating under the predominant code. Going in expecting five separate ratings sets you up for a letdown.
  • Not documenting weight loss or anemia. These findings can raise the level, but only if the file shows them. A missing weight log or lab result can leave a rating lower than the condition warrants.
  • Not tying a GI condition to your other medications. GERD or gastritis from the NSAIDs you take for a service-connected joint is a real secondary claim that is easy to overlook.
  • Claiming only one condition. Some abdominal conditions are rated separately, a hernia or hemorrhoids, for example. If one of those also applies, claiming only the stomach condition leaves a rating on the table.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the VA rate digestive conditions?
Almost all of them are rated under 38 CFR 4.114, mostly by symptom severity, a mild, moderate, or severe picture based on how often attacks happen and how bad the pain, vomiting, or diarrhea is, rather than by a single test number. Weight loss and anemia can push several codes higher, and a special rule limits how overlapping abdominal conditions are rated.
Can I get separate ratings for GERD, IBS, and an ulcer?
Usually no. Under the coexisting-conditions rule (38 CFR 4.113 and 4.114), abdominal conditions with overlapping symptoms are generally not rated separately and combined. Instead the VA assigns one rating under the code for the predominant disability, so the same stomach pain is not counted several times. The real question is usually which single code best captures your overall picture.
What is the coexisting-conditions rule?
It is the signature rule of the digestive schedule. When several abdominal conditions produce overlapping symptoms, for example GERD, an ulcer, a hiatal hernia, IBS, and gastritis, they are generally combined into a single evaluation assigned under the diagnostic code that reflects the predominant disability, rather than each being rated on its own. It prevents rating the same symptom more than once.
Does weight loss matter for my rating?
Yes. Sustained weight loss, along with lab-confirmed anemia and malnutrition, is a sign of a more severe condition and pushes several digestive codes into a higher bracket. Keeping a dated weight record and making sure it is in your file can matter to the level assigned.
Is hepatitis C rated here?
Yes, but on its own terms. Liver disease such as hepatitis C is rated under 38 CFR 4.114 on its specific findings, not folded into a single combined abdominal evaluation like the overlapping stomach conditions are. See the hepatitis C guide for how it is scored.

Related Tools and Guides

Sources: 38 CFR 4.114, digestive system ratings. Educational only, not legal advice, and not a prediction of any individual claim. Rating criteria change; confirm current details in 38 CFR Part 4. For help with your claim, find a VA-accredited representative.