Digestive Conditions Rating Guide
Stomach, bowel, and liver conditions are among the most common VA disability claims, and almost all of them are rated under the same schedule: 38 CFR § 4.114. Most turn on how severe your symptoms are, and one rule about overlapping conditions decides more of them than any other. Learn that pattern once and you understand your whole claim. This guide explains the rules that decide every digestive rating, then points you to the detailed guide for your specific condition.
The Rules That Decide Every Digestive Claim
Most digestive codes are rated on symptom severity, not on a single test number. The examiner and the rater look at your overall picture, a mild, moderate, or severe pattern, and match it to the criteria for your condition. A string of shared rules sits on top of that, and one of them decides more abdominal claims than anything else.
1. Most digestive conditions are rated by symptom severity
Stomach and bowel codes are generally scored as a mild, moderate, or severe symptom picture, how often attacks happen, how bad the pain is, and whether there is vomiting or diarrhea, rather than by a single lab value. The worse and more frequent the symptoms, the higher the rating. Because the words matter, a treatment record that documents the pattern is worth more than one that only lists a diagnosis.
2. Weight loss, anemia, and malnutrition raise the rating
Sustained weight loss and lab-confirmed anemia are signs of a more severe condition, and they push several digestive codes into a higher bracket. Malnutrition works the same way. If these are happening and the file does not show them, the rating can come back lower than the condition actually warrants.
3. The coexisting-conditions rule is the signature of this schedule
This is the rule that decides the most digestive claims. Under 38 CFR § 4.113 and § 4.114, abdominal conditions that produce overlapping symptoms, for example GERD, an ulcer, a hiatal hernia, IBS, and gastritis, generally are not rated separately and combined. Instead, a single evaluation is assigned under the diagnostic code that reflects the predominant disability. The point is to avoid rating the same stomach pain several times over. Knowing this in advance changes how you frame a claim: you are usually arguing about which one code best captures the whole picture, not stacking five of them.
4. A few conditions are rated on their own terms
Not everything in the abdomen follows the coexisting-conditions rule. Liver disease, such as hepatitis C, is rated on its own specific findings rather than folded into a single abdominal evaluation. Hemorrhoids and hernias also have their own scales and are handled separately. So a hernia or hemorrhoids can often be claimed alongside a stomach condition that is already rated.
Find the Guide for Your Condition
The rules above apply across the board. For the exact rating levels, the C&P exam, and the Board data for your specific condition, open the dedicated guide:
| Area | Guide | DC codes |
|---|---|---|
| GERD | GERD Claims Guide | 7206 |
| Peptic ulcer | Peptic Ulcer Guide | 7304 |
| IBS and IBD | IBS and IBD Guide | 7319 |
| Ulcerative colitis | Ulcerative Colitis Guide | 7323 |
| Crohn's disease | Crohn's Disease Guide | 7326 |
| Hemorrhoids | Hemorrhoids Guide | 7336 |
| Hernia | Hernia Guide | 7338 |
| Hepatitis C | Hepatitis C Guide | 7354 |
| Celiac disease | Celiac Disease Guide | 7355 |
For any code not listed, open its condition lookup page for the rating levels and Board data.
Every Digestive Diagnostic Code, With Board Outcomes
Every diagnostic code in this body system, ordered by how often it reaches the Board of Veterans' Appeals. Percentages are the share of each code's Board issues granted, denied, or remanded (sent back for more development); dismissed and other outcomes are not shown, so rows do not sum to 100%. Each code links to its full page: rating criteria, evidence notes, and secondary-condition data.
Show 17 more codes with too few Board appeals to report (expand)
| DC | Condition | Board appeals | Granted | Denied | Remanded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7201 | Lips, injuries of | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7202 | Tongue, loss of whole or part | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7205 | Esophagus, diverticulum of, acquired | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7303 | Chronic complications of upper gastrointestinal surgery | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7309 | Stomach, stenosis of | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7310 | Stomach, injury of, residuals | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7314 | Chronic biliary tract disease | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7317 | Gallbladder, injury of | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7325 | Enteritis, chronic | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7331 | Peritonitis, tuberculous, active or inactive | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7333 | Rectum and anus, stricture of | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7334 | Rectum, prolapse of | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7337 | Pruritus ani (anal itching) | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7342 | Visceroptosis, symptomatic, marked | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7350 | Liver abscess | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7352 | Pancreas transplant | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
| 7357 | Post pancreatectomy syndrome | Too few Board appeals to report | |||
Counts from RateMyVSO's index of published BVA decisions, refreshed weekly. A remand is not a loss; it means the Board needed more evidence before deciding. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction for any claim.
Common Secondary Conditions
Digestive problems rarely arrive alone. Because the gut reacts to medication and to stress, one service-connected condition often opens the door to several secondary claims:
- GERD or gastritis from pain medication. Long-term NSAID use for a service-connected condition, a bad back or knee, for example, can irritate the stomach and cause GERD or gastritis as a secondary condition.
- Conditions from a medication regimen. More broadly, a digestive condition can be claimed as secondary to the service-connected medications you have to take for something else.
- Weight loss and malnutrition. A chronic GI condition that keeps you from absorbing or keeping down food can drive weight loss and malnutrition, which are themselves part of the disability picture.
- Depression or anxiety. A chronic, unpredictable, and often embarrassing digestive condition can drive depression and anxiety, which can be claimed as secondary to the physical condition. See secondary conditions.
Each dedicated guide above shows the live Board grant rates for that condition's most common pairings.
Evidence That Wins
- Endoscopy, colonoscopy, or imaging confirming the condition, the objective backbone that shows the diagnosis is real and how far it has progressed.
- A weight record showing sustained loss, dated over time, because weight loss is one of the findings that moves several digestive codes into a higher bracket.
- Lab work showing anemia, which, like weight loss, is a marker of a more severe condition and can raise the rating.
- Treatment records showing the pattern and medications, how often symptoms flare, how severe they get, and what you are prescribed. The pattern is what most digestive codes are rated on.
- The matching DBQ for the condition, which prompts the examiner to capture the severity and frequency the rating depends on. See the DBQ guide.
Evidence Cited in Published GERD Decisions
We analyzed 30,956 published Board decisions involving gerd for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 63.5%, combining every diagnostic code below. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.
By diagnostic code
These codes are grouped together above. They do not perform the same, so find your own code here rather than reading the combined figure. Codes retired in the schedule rewrites are left out, because their old decisions were judged under criteria that no longer apply.
Evidence Cited in Published Peptic ulcer disease Decisions
We analyzed 7,736 published Board decisions involving peptic ulcer disease for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 51.8%. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.
Evidence Cited in Published IBS Decisions
We analyzed 20,472 published Board decisions involving ibs for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 60.1%. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.
Evidence Cited in Published Ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s (IBD) Decisions
We analyzed 4,669 published Board decisions involving ulcerative colitis and crohn’s (ibd) for condition-specific evidence, counting only case-specific mentions (boilerplate recitations excluded). "Favorable" is the share of decisions citing that evidence where every issue was granted or the outcome was mixed; the baseline across all these decisions is 41%, combining every diagnostic code below. Evidence appearing in a decision does not mean it decided the case. Descriptive of the published record, not a prediction.
By diagnostic code
These codes are grouped together above. They do not perform the same, so find your own code here rather than reading the combined figure. Codes retired in the schedule rewrites are left out, because their old decisions were judged under criteria that no longer apply.
Detected by phrase-reading the decision text with condition-specific vocabularies. Source: Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, RateMyVSO analysis.
Symptoms Recorded in Granted GERD Decisions
We analyzed 2,673 granted Board decisions involving gerd for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.
Symptoms Recorded in Granted Peptic ulcer disease Decisions
We analyzed 470 granted Board decisions involving peptic ulcer disease for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.
Symptoms Recorded in Granted IBS Decisions
We analyzed 1,457 granted Board decisions involving ibs for symptoms named in sentences about the condition (rating-criteria recitations excluded). Descriptive of the published record, what the Board wrote down, not a checklist of what to report.
Detected by phrase-reading the decision text with condition-specific vocabularies. Source: Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, RateMyVSO analysis.
Common Mistakes
- Expecting to stack several overlapping stomach conditions. The coexisting-conditions rule collapses GERD, an ulcer, a hiatal hernia, and gastritis into a single rating under the predominant code. Going in expecting five separate ratings sets you up for a letdown.
- Not documenting weight loss or anemia. These findings can raise the level, but only if the file shows them. A missing weight log or lab result can leave a rating lower than the condition warrants.
- Not tying a GI condition to your other medications. GERD or gastritis from the NSAIDs you take for a service-connected joint is a real secondary claim that is easy to overlook.
- Claiming only one condition. Some abdominal conditions are rated separately, a hernia or hemorrhoids, for example. If one of those also applies, claiming only the stomach condition leaves a rating on the table.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does the VA rate digestive conditions?
Can I get separate ratings for GERD, IBS, and an ulcer?
What is the coexisting-conditions rule?
Does weight loss matter for my rating?
Is hepatitis C rated here?
Related Tools and Guides
Sources: 38 CFR 4.114, digestive system ratings. Educational only, not legal advice, and not a prediction of any individual claim. Rating criteria change; confirm current details in 38 CFR Part 4. For help with your claim, find a VA-accredited representative.